Literature DB >> 20643732

Evolution of quantitative traits in the wild: mind the ecology.

Josephine M Pemberton1.   

Abstract

Recent advances in the quantitative genetics of traits in wild animal populations have created new interest in whether natural selection, and genetic response to it, can be detected within long-term ecological studies. However, such studies have re-emphasized the fact that ecological heterogeneity can confound our ability to infer selection on genetic variation and detect a population's response to selection by conventional quantitative genetics approaches. Here, I highlight three manifestations of this issue: counter gradient variation, environmentally induced covariance between traits and the correlated effects of a fluctuating environment. These effects are symptomatic of the oversimplifications and strong assumptions of the breeder's equation when it is applied to natural populations. In addition, methods to assay genetic change in quantitative traits have overestimated the precision with which change can be measured. In the future, a more conservative approach to inferring quantitative genetic response to selection, or genomic approaches allowing the estimation of selection intensity and responses to selection at known quantitative trait loci, will provide a more precise view of evolution in ecological time.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643732      PMCID: PMC2935108          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  36 in total

Review 1.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Gene mapping in the wild with SNPs: guidelines and future directions.

Authors:  Jon Slate; Jake Gratten; Dario Beraldi; Jessica Stapley; Matt Hale; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation.

Authors:  D O Conover; E T Schultz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds.

Authors:  T Price; M Kirkpatrick; S J Arnold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Selection and covariance.

Authors:  G R Price
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population.

Authors:  Dany Garant; Loeske E B Kruuk; Teddy A Wilkin; Robin H McCleery; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod.

Authors:  Esben M Olsen; Mikko Heino; George R Lilly; M Joanne Morgan; John Brattey; Bruno Ernande; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The impact of environmental heterogeneity on genetic architecture in a wild population of Soay sheep.

Authors:  Matthew R Robinson; Alastair J Wilson; Jill G Pilkington; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genetic architecture of parallel armor plate reduction in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Pamela F Colosimo; Catherine L Peichel; Kirsten Nereng; Benjamin K Blackman; Michael D Shapiro; Dolph Schluter; David M Kingsley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  15 in total

1.  Genetics and the causes of evolution: 150 years of progress since Darwin.

Authors:  Michael Bonsall; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Evolutionary rescue beyond the models.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Ruth G Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Understanding the biology of species' ranges: when and how does evolution change the rules of ecological engagement?

Authors:  Jon Bridle; Ary Hoffmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Moose body mass variation revisited: disentangling effects of environmental conditions and genetics.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Hallvard Haanes; Erling J Solberg; Knut H Røed; Kjell Arild Høgda; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Genetic correlations in the rhesus macaque dentition.

Authors:  Anna M Hardin
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  How migratory populations become resident.

Authors:  Tiago de Zoeten; Francisco Pulido
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Predicting evolutionary responses to selection on polyandry in the wild: additive genetic covariances with female extra-pair reproduction.

Authors:  Jane M Reid
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Can number and size of offspring increase simultaneously?--a central life-history trade-off reconsidered.

Authors:  Eero Schroderus; Minna Koivula; Esa Koskela; Tapio Mappes; Tuula A Oksanen; Tanja Poikonen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Genetic contributions to dental dimensions in brown-mantled tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Anna M Hardin
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  An alternative to the breeder's and Lande's equations.

Authors:  Bahram Houchmandzadeh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.