Literature DB >> 18211871

Maturational costs of reproduction due to clutch size and ontogenetic conflict as revealed in the invisible fraction.

Barry Sinervo1, Andrew G McAdam.   

Abstract

Reproduction is thought to entail costs, but assessing survival costs associated with maturation as organisms express reproductive genes for the first time is problematic because many will die prior to expressing a phenotype. We quantified selection acting on this invisible fraction by measuring selection on predicted breeding values for clutch size estimated from a multigenerational pedigree of side-blotched lizards in which clutch size was heritable (h2=0.25+/-0.04). The survival effects of predicted breeding values for clutch size during maturation, however, differed between males and females indicating ontogenetic conflict. Increased mortality during maturation was associated with lower predicted breeding values for clutch size for females, but higher predicted breeding values for males who do not produce a clutch. Genetic correlations between clutch size and male and female survival were consistent with calculated selection differentials. Experimental yolk removal did not affect progeny survival during maturation, indicating that selection on maturing progeny was not due to confounding yolk-volume maternal effects, and hormone manipulations confirmed clutch size as the target of viability selection during maturation. Such episodes of selection prior to phenotypic expression of the trait will have important consequences for the evolution of reproductive investment.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211871      PMCID: PMC2596848          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  26 in total

1.  Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection.

Authors:  B Sinervo; E Svensson; T Comendant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  L E Kruuk; T H Clutton-Brock; J Slate; J M Pemberton; S Brotherstone; F E Guinness
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Correlational selection on lay date and life-history traits: experimental manipulations of territory and nest site quality.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Allometric engineering: a causal analysis of natural selection on offspring size.

Authors:  B Sinervo; K Zamudio; P Doughty; R B Huey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-12-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Hormonal manipulation of offspring number: maternal effort and reproductive costs.

Authors:  Tuula A Oksanen; Esa Koskela; Tapio Mappes
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

Authors:  T C Marshall; J Slate; L E Kruuk; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Testosterone and avian life histories: the effect of experimentally elevated testosterone on corticosterone and body mass in dark-eyed juncos.

Authors:  E D Ketterson; V Nolan; L Wolf; C Ziegenfus; A M Dufty; G F Ball; T S Johnsen
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

1.  Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential component of natural selection.

Authors:  Julius P Mojica; John K Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Introduction. Evolutionary dynamics of wild populations: the use of long-term pedigree data.

Authors:  L E B Kruuk; W G Hill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Offspring size and timing of hatching determine survival and reproductive output in a lizard.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Mats Olsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predicting evolutionary responses to selection on polyandry in the wild: additive genetic covariances with female extra-pair reproduction.

Authors:  Jane M Reid
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Correlates of male fitness in captive zebra finches--a comparison of methods to disentangle genetic and environmental effects.

Authors:  Elisabeth Bolund; Holger Schielzeth; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Evidence of maternal effects on temperature preference in side-blotched lizards: implications for evolutionary response to climate change.

Authors:  Dhanashree A Paranjpe; Elizabeth Bastiaans; Amy Patten; Robert D Cooper; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Integrating viability and fecundity selection to illuminate the adaptive nature of genetic clines.

Authors:  Susana M Wadgymar; S Caroline Daws; Jill T Anderson
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2017-05-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.