Literature DB >> 17254998

Male phenotypic quality influences offspring sex ratio in a polygynous ungulate.

Knut H Røed1, Øystein Holand, Atle Mysterud, Aage Tverdal, Jouko Kumpula, Mauri Nieminen.   

Abstract

Evolutionary models of sex ratio adjustment applied to mammals have ignored that females may gain indirect genetic benefits from their mates. The differential allocation hypothesis (DAH) predicts that females bias the sex ratio of their offspring towards (more costly) males when breeding with an attractive male. We manipulated the number of available males during rut in a polygynous ungulate species, the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), and found that a doubling of average male mass (and thus male attractiveness) in the breeding herd increased the proportion of male offspring from approximately 40 to 60%. Paternity analysis revealed indeed that males of high phenotypic quality sired more males, consistent with the DAH. This insight has consequences for proper management of large mammal populations. Our study suggests that harvesting, by generating a high proportion of young, small and unattractive mates, affects the secondary sex ratio due to differential allocation effects in females. Sustainable management needs to consider not only the direct demographic changes due to harvest mortality and selection, but also the components related to behavioural ecology and opportunities for female choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17254998      PMCID: PMC2197213          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs.

Authors:  D Gil; J Graves; N Hazon; A Wells
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Uncoupling direct and indirect components of female choice in the wild.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting.

Authors:  David W Coltman; Paul O'Donoghue; Jon T Jorgenson; John T Hogg; Curtis Strobeck; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Facultative adjustment of mammalian sex ratios in support of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: evidence for a mechanism.

Authors:  Elissa Z Cameron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  L E Kruuk; T H Clutton-Brock; J Slate; J M Pemberton; S Brotherstone; F E Guinness
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer.

Authors:  L E Kruuk; T H Clutton-Brock; K E Rose; F E Guinness
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Differential sex allocation in sand lizards: bright males induce daughter production in a species with heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mats Olsson; Erik Wapstra; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard.

Authors:  E J Cunningham; A F Russell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Reproductive success in reindeer males in a herd with varying sex ratio.

Authors:  Knut H Røed; Øystein Holand; Martin E Smith; Hallvard Gjøstein; Jouko Kumpula; Mauri Nieminen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sex-biased parental investment is correlated with mate ornamentation in eastern bluebirds.

Authors:  Russell A Ligon; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Father-offspring phenotypic correlations suggest intralocus sexual conflict for a fitness-linked trait in a wild sexually dimorphic mammal.

Authors:  Julien Mainguy; Steeve D Côté; Marco Festa-Bianchet; David W Coltman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Highly competitive reindeer males control female behavior during the rut.

Authors:  Guillaume Body; Robert B Weladji; Øystein Holand; Mauri Nieminen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Bet-hedging across generations can affect the evolution of variance-sensitive strategies within generations.

Authors:  Thomas R Haaland; Jonathan Wright; Irja I Ratikainen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Environmentally enriched male mink gain more copulations than stereotypic, barren-reared competitors.

Authors:  María Díez-León; Jeff Bowman; Steve Bursian; Hélène Filion; David Galicia; Jeannette Kanefsky; Angelo Napolitano; Rupert Palme; Albrecht Schulte-Hostedde; Kim Scribner; Georgia Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gestational experience alters sex allocation in the subsequent generation.

Authors:  A M Edwards; E Z Cameron; J C Pereira; E Wapstra; M A Ferguson-Smith; S R Horton; K Thomasson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.