Literature DB >> 17874278

Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Jacek Radwan1.   

Abstract

Female preferences for elaborate male sexual traits have been documented in a number of species in which males contribute only genes to the next generation. In such systems, mate choice has been hypothesised to benefit females genetically. For the genetic benefits to be possible there must be additive genetic variation (V A) for sexual ornaments, such that highly ornamented males can pass fitter genes on to the progeny of choosy females. Here, I review the mechanisms that can contribute to the maintenance of this variation. The variation may be limited to sexual ornaments, resulting in Fisherian benefits in terms of the increased reproductive success of male progeny produced by choosy females. Alternatively, ornaments may capture V A in other life-history traits. In the latter case, "good genes" benefits may apply in terms of improved performance of the progeny of either sex. Some mechanisms, however, such as negative pleiotropy, sexually antagonistic variation or overdominance, can maintain V A in ornaments and other life-history traits with little variation in total fitness, leaving little room for any genetic benefits of mate choice. Distinguishing between these mechanisms has consequences not only for the theory of sexual selection, but also for evolution of sex and for biological conservation. I discuss how the traditional ways of testing for genetic benefits can usefully be supplemented by tests detecting benefits resulting from specific mechanisms maintaining V A in sexual ornaments.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874278     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9203-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  110 in total

1.  Deleterious mutations and genetic variation for flower size in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  J K Kelly; J H Willis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration.

Authors:  S R Proulx
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  Janne S Kotiaho; Leigh W Simmons; John Hunt; Joseph L Tomkins
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Stephen F Chenoweth; Emma Hine
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  The molecular ecologist's guide to expressed sequence tags.

Authors:  Amy Bouck; Todd Vision
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: RESISTANCE TO "RESISTANCE".

Authors:  Gil G Rosenthal; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Polymorphism in a varied environment: how robust are the models?

Authors:  J M Smith; R Hoekstra
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  28 in total

1.  Sexual selection drives the evolution of male wing interference patterns.

Authors:  M F Hawkes; E Duffy; R Joag; A Skeats; J Radwan; N Wedell; M D Sharma; D J Hosken; J Troscianko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  An introduction to genetic quality in the context of sexual selection.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; Herman L Mays
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Predation shapes sperm performance surfaces in guppies.

Authors:  Alessandro Devigili; Jonathan P Evans; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mating system affects population performance and extinction risk under environmental challenge.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Anna M Skrzynecka; Zofia M Prokop; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Are large wattles related to particular MHC genotypes in the male pheasant?

Authors:  Mariella Baratti; Martina Ammannati; Claudia Magnelli; Alessandro Massolo; Francesco Dessì-Fulgheri
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Breeding experience and the heritability of female mate choice in collared flycatchers.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Márton Herényi; Alastair J Wilson; László Zsolt Garamszegi; Balázs Rosivall; Marcel Eens; János Török
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?

Authors:  Atle Mysterud; Richard Bischof
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.