Literature DB >> 12147600

Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields.

Pamela A Sample1, Michael H Goldbaum, Kwokleung Chan, Catherine Boden, Te-Won Lee, Christiana Vasile, Andreas G Boehm, Terrence Sejnowski, Chris A Johnson, Robert N Weinreb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the ability of several machine learning classifiers to predict development of abnormal fields at follow-up in ocular hypertensive (OHT) eyes that had normal visual fields in baseline examination.
METHODS: The visual fields of 114 eyes of 114 patients with OHT with four or more visual field tests with standard automated perimetry over three or more years and for whom stereophotographs were available were assessed. The mean (+/-SD) number of visual field tests was 7.89 +/- 3.04. The mean number of years covered (+/-SD) was 5.92 +/- 2.34 (range, 2.81-11.77). Fields were classified as normal or abnormal based on Statpac-like methods (Humphrey Instruments, Dublin, CA) and by several machine learning classifiers. The machine learning classifiers were two types of support vector machine (SVM), a mixture of Gaussian (MoG) classifier, a constrained MoG, and a mixture of generalized Gaussian (MGG). Specificity was set to 96% for all classifiers, using data from 94 normal eyes evaluated longitudinally. Specificity cutoffs required confirmation of abnormality.
RESULTS: Thirty-two percent (36/114) of the eyes converted to abnormal fields during follow-up based on the Statpac-like methods. All 36 were identified by at least one machine classifier. In nearly all cases, the machine learning classifiers predicted the confirmed abnormality, on average, 3.92 +/- 0.55 years earlier than traditional Statpac-like methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning classifiers can learn complex patterns and trends in data and adapt to create a decision surface without the constraints imposed by statistical classifiers. This adaptation allowed the machine learning classifiers to identify abnormality in visual field converts much earlier than the traditional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12147600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  14 in total

1.  Glaucomatous progression in series of stereoscopic photographs and Heidelberg retina tomograph images.

Authors:  Neil O'Leary; David P Crabb; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Michael D Twa; Michael J Lloyd; Aachal Kotecha; David F Garway-Heath; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Bettina Selig; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Using unsupervised learning with independent component analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael H Goldbaum; Pamela A Sample; Zuohua Zhang; Kwokleung Chan; Jiucang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Catherine Boden; Christopher Bowd; Rupert Bourne; Linda Zangwill; Terrence Sejnowski; David Spinak; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  [Measurement of peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness at different distances from the optic nerve head with OCT].

Authors:  A G Böhm; E Schmidt; M Müller-Holz; L E Pillunat
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Unsupervised learning with independent component analysis can identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  Michael Henry Goldbaum
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: a review and practical implications.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Nariman Nassiri; Annette Giangiacomo; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Patterns of glaucomatous visual field loss in sita fields automatically identified using independent component analysis.

Authors:  Michael H Goldbaum; Gil-Jin Jang; Chris Bowd; Jiucang Hao; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey Liebmann; Christopher Girkin; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

8.  Glaucoma detection and evaluation through pattern recognition in standard automated perimetry data.

Authors:  Dariusz Wroblewski; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; A Shahem Kawji; Peter Quiros; Laurie Dustin; R Kemp Massengill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Assessing visual field clustering schemes using machine learning classifiers in standard perimetry.

Authors:  Catherine Boden; Kwokleung Chan; Pamela A Sample; Jiucang Hao; Te-Wan Lee; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Linda M Zangwill; Kwokleung Chan; Christopher Bowd; Jicuang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Robert N Weinreb; Terrence J Sejnowski; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.