Literature DB >> 12123316

Advanced contour detection for three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: a validation--in vitro and in vivo.

Gerhard Koning1, Jouke Dijkstra, Clemens von Birgelen, Joan C Tuinenburg, Jean Brunette, Jean-Claude Tardif, Pranobe W Oemrawsingh, Christian Sieling, Sören Melsa, Johan H C Reiber.   

Abstract

Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) provides high-resolution transmural images of the arterial wall. By performing a pullback of the ICUS transducer and three-dimensional reconstruction of the images, an advanced assessment of the lumen and vessel wall morphology can be obtained. To reduce the analysis time and the subjectivity of boundary tracing, automated segmentation of the image sequence must be performed. The Quantitative Coronary Ultrasound-Clinical Measurement Solutions (QCU-CMS) (semi)automated analytical software package uses a combination of transversal and longitudinal model- and knowledge-guided contour detection techniques. On multiple longitudinal sections through the pullback stack, the external vessel contours are detected simultaneously, allowing mutual guidance of the detection in difficult areas. Subsequently, luminal contours are detected on these longitudinal sections. Vessel and luminal contour points are transformed to the individual cross-sections, where they guide the vessel and lumen contour detection on these transversal images. The performance of the software was validated stepwise. A set of phantoms was used to determine the systematic and random errors of the contour detection of external vessel and lumen boundaries. Subsequently, the results of the contour detection as obtained in in vivo image sets were compared with expert manual tracing, and finally the contour detection in in vivo image sequences was compared with results obtained from another previously validated ICUS quantification system. The phantom lumen diameters were underestimated by 0.1 mm, equally by the QCU-CMS software and by manual tracing. Comparison of automatically detected contours and expert manual contours, showed that lumen contours correspond very well (systematic and random radius difference: -0.025 +/- 0.067 mm), while automatically detected vessel contours slightly overestimated the expert manual contours (radius difference: 0.061 +/- 0.037 mm). The cross-sectional vessel and lumen areas as detected with our system and with the second computerized system showed a high correlation (r = 0.995 and 0.978, respectively). Thus, use of the new QCU-CMS analytical software is feasible and the validation data suggest its application for the analysis of clinical research.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12123316     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015551920382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  13 in total

1.  Fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound in vivo: establishing the absolute 3-D frame orientation.

Authors:  A Wahle; G P Prause; C von Birgelen; R Erbel; M Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images by fusion with biplane angiography--methods and validation.

Authors:  A Wahle; P M Prause; S C DeJong; M Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  On the IVUS plaque volume error in coronary arteries when neglecting curvature.

Authors:  J C Schuurbiers; C von Birgelen; J J Wentzel; N Bom; P W Serruys; P J de Feyter; C J Slager
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  A novel realistic three-layer phantom for intravascular ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  J Brunette; R Mongrain; G Cloutier; M Bertrand; O F Bertrand; J C Tardif
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Robust simultaneous detection of coronary borders in complex images.

Authors:  M Sonka; M D Winniford; S M Collins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Morphometric analysis in three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: an in vitro and in vivo study performed with a novel system for the contour detection of lumen and plaque.

Authors:  C von Birgelen; C Di Mario; W Li; J C Schuurbiers; C J Slager; P J de Feyter; J R Roelandt; P W Serruys
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  ECG-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: feasibility and reproducibility of the automated analysis of coronary lumen and atherosclerotic plaque dimensions in humans.

Authors:  C von Birgelen; E A de Vrey; G S Mintz; A Nicosia; N Bruining; W Li; C J Slager; J R Roelandt; P W Serruys; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  B N Potkin; A L Bartorelli; J M Gessert; R F Neville; Y Almagor; W C Roberts; M B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Application of intracoronary ultrasonography in the study of coronary artery pathophysiology.

Authors:  Q Rasheed; J M Hodgson
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.910

View more
  17 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of mild-to-moderate coronary atherosclerosis by computerized border detection in 3D IVUS.

Authors:  Clemen von Birgelen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Accurate plaque volume measurements in 3D reconstructed IVUS pullback sequences.

Authors:  Jouke Dijkstra; Stephane Carlier
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  The devil may be in the details...quantitative measurements in intravascular ultrasound images.

Authors:  Jouke Dijkstra; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Towards quantitative analysis of coronary CTA.

Authors:  Henk A Marquering; Jouke Dijkstra; Patrick J H de Koning; Berend C Stoel; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Segmentation of elastographic images using a coarse-to-fine active contour model.

Authors:  Wu Liu; James A Zagzebski; Tomy Varghese; Charles R Dyer; Udomchai Techavipoo; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Dual source computed tomography: automated, visual or dual analysis?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  The 5352 A allele of the pro-inflammatory caspase-1 gene predicts late-acquired stent malapposition in STEMI patients treated with sirolimus stents.

Authors:  Sandrin C Bergheanu; Douwe Pons; Bas L van der Hoeven; Su-San Liem; Bob Siegerink; Martin J Schalij; Johanna G van der Bom; J Wouter Jukema
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Calibration-free coronary artery measurements for interventional device sizing using inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Michael T Tomkowiak; Amish N Raval; Michael S Van Lysel; Tobias Funk; Michael A Speidel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-10

9.  Calibration-Free Coronary Artery Measurements for Interventional Device Sizing using Inverse Geometry X-ray Fluoroscopy: In Vivo Validation.

Authors:  Michael T Tomkowiak; Amish N Raval; Michael S Van Lysel; Tobias Funk; Michael A Speidel
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-19

10.  Impact of pioglitazone on coronary endothelial function in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jochen Wöhrle; Nikolaus Marx; Wolfgang Koenig; Vinzenz Hombach; Hans A Kestler; Martin Höher; Thorsten Nusser
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.