Literature DB >> 26586268

The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.

Pascasie L Dombert1, Gereon R Fink2,3, Simone Vossel2.   

Abstract

Allocation of attentional resources rests on predictions about the likelihood of events. While this effect has been extensively studied in the spatial attention domain where the location of a target stimulus is pre-cued, less is known about the cueing of stimulus features such as the color of a behaviorally relevant target. Moreover, there is disagreement about which types of color cues are effective for biasing attention. Here we investigated the effects of probabilistic context (percentage of cue validity, %CV) for different levels of cue abstraction to elucidate how feature-based search information is processed and used to direct attention. The color of a target was cued by presenting the perceptual color, the color word, or two-letter abbreviations. %CV, i.e., the probability that the cue indicated the color correctly, changed unpredictably between 50, 70, and 90%. Response times (RTs) for valid and invalid trials in each %CV condition were recorded in 60 datasets and analyzed with analyses of variance. The results showed that all cues were associated with comparable RT costs after invalid cueing. The modulation of RT costs by probabilities, however, depended upon level of cue abstraction and time on task: While a strong, immediate impact of %CV was found for two-letter cueing, the effect was solely observed in the second half of the experiment for perceptual and word cues. These results demonstrate that probabilistic feature-based information is processed differently for different levels of cue abstraction. Moreover, the modulatory effect of the environmental statistics differentially depends on the time on task for different feature cues.

Keywords:  Color cueing; Cue validity; Probabilistic context; Time on task; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586268     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4487-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention.

Authors:  B Giesbrecht; M G Woldorff; A W Song; G R Mangun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: evidence for multiple weighting systems.

Authors:  Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

6.  Neural integration of top-down spatial and feature-based information in visual search.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Jim M P Monti; Emily H Trittschuh; Christina A Wieneke; Joy Hirsch; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Common and distinct neural regions for the guidance of selection by visuoverbal information held in memory: converging evidence from fMRI and rTMS.

Authors:  David Soto; Pia Rotshtein; John Hodsoll; Carmel Mevorach; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide.

Authors:  Jean Daunizeau; Hanneke E M den Ouden; Matthias Pessiglione; Stefan J Kiebel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Attention and predictions: control of spatial attention beyond the endogenous-exogenous dichotomy.

Authors:  Emiliano Macaluso; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Understanding active sampling strategies: Empirical approaches and implications for attention and decision research.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Combined expectancies: the role of expectations for the coding of salient bottom-up signals.

Authors:  Michael Wiesing; Gereon R Fink; Ralph Weidner; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.