Literature DB >> 14651304

Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect.

Peter Wühr1, Florian Waszak.   

Abstract

The Stroop (1935) effect is the inability to ignore a color word when the task is to report the ink color of that word (i.e., to say "green" to the word RED in green ink). The present study investigated whether object-based processing contributes to the Stroop effect. According to this view, observers are unable to ignore irrelevant features of an attended object (Kahneman & Henik, 1981). In three experiments, participants had to name the color of one of two superimposed rectangles and to ignore words that appeared in the relevant object, in the irrelevant object, or in the background. The words were congruent, neutral, or incongruent with respect to the correct color response. Words in the irrelevant object and in the background produced significant Stroop effects, consistent with earlier findings. Importantly, however, words in the relevant object produced larger Stroop effects than did the other conditions, suggesting amplified processing of all the features of an attended object. Thus, object-based processing can modulate the Stroop effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14651304     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

3.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

4.  Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color.

Authors:  F N Dyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-08

5.  Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.

Authors:  R D Melara; J R Mounts
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-09

6.  Does visual attention select objects or locations?

Authors:  S P Vecera; M J Farah
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

7.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection.

Authors:  A H Van der Heijden; R Hagenaar; W Bloem
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-09

9.  Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.

Authors:  R A Virzi; H E Egeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-07

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.

Authors:  Isabel A David; Eliane Volchan; Jaime Vila; Andreas Keil; Letícia de Oliveira; Aydamari J P Faria-Júnior; Pandelis Perakakis; Elisa C Dias; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes G Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Martina Weltle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

3.  Inhibition is picky: shape difference is a necessary condition for attentional inhibition of irrelevant objects.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

4.  Anti-saccade error rates as a measure of attentional bias in cocaine dependent subjects.

Authors:  Nadeeka R Dias; Joy M Schmitz; Nuvan Rathnayaka; Stuart D Red; Anne B Sereno; F Gerard Moeller; Scott D Lane
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perceptual and attentional factors in encoding irrelevant spatial information.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Rupert Biebl; Carlo Umiltà; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-09-12

6.  Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Linda Wheeldon; Femke van der Meulen; Agnieszka Konopka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-20

7.  Relative, not absolute, stimulus size is responsible for a correspondence effect between physical stimulus size and left/right responses.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Melanie Richter
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.