Literature DB >> 26435316

Novel Symbol Learning-Induced Stroop Effect: Evidence for a Strategy-Based, Utility Learning Model.

Jin Wang1,2, Huijun Tang1,2, Yuan Deng3.   

Abstract

The automaticity level and attention priority/strategy are two major theories that have attempted to explain the mechanism underlying the Stroop effect. Training is an effective way to manipulate the experience with the two dimensions (ink color and color word) in the Stroop task. In order to distinguish the above two factors (the automaticity or attention/strategy), we revised the training paradigm of MacLeod's study (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 14(1):126-135, 1988) by adding a control condition for the Stroop task on Chinese. We found that with training, the changing pattern for the Stroop effect was similar in Stroop tasks in novel symbols and in Chinese, showing markedly increasing interference and marginally decreasing facilitation. The current findings support the strategy-based learning account at early stages of novel learning of written symbols.

Keywords:  Automaticity; Interference; Strategy-based; Stroop; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26435316     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-015-9397-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  29 in total

1.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  The relationship between Stroop interference and facilitation effects: statistical artifacts, baselines, and a reassessment.

Authors:  Tracy L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.

Authors:  R H Phaf; A H Van der Heijden; P T Hudson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  General associative learning shapes the plasticity of the visual word form area.

Authors:  Yiying Song; Yong Bu; Jia Liu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Adding words to the brain's visual dictionary: novel word learning selectively sharpens orthographic representations in the VWFA.

Authors:  Laurie S Glezer; Judy Kim; Josh Rule; Xiong Jiang; Maximilian Riesenhuber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The activation of segmental and tonal information in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Chuchu Li; Candise Y Lin; Min Wang; Nan Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

9.  Automaticity and word perception: evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects.

Authors:  T L Brown; L Roos-Gilbert; T H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.