Literature DB >> 15597186

Hierarchical number estimation.

Jay Friedenberg1, William Limratana.   

Abstract

We investigated number estimation using dot patterns grouped by proximity into larger clusters. Participants estimated the number of dots and clusters in separate trials. Estimation was most accurate when the numbers of elements on both scales were the same. When the number of elements on the unattended scale was higher, overestimation occurred. Conversely, when the number of elements on the unattended scale was lower, underestimation occurred. In Experiment 2, response cues were blocked to reduce any tendency toward attending the irrelevant level. The results were essentially unchanged, indicating response confusion alone cannot account for the effect. The data support the existence of an opposite scale effect in which the number of elements at the unattended level influence the processing of number.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15597186     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0169-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  18 in total

1.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review.

Authors:  R Kimchi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; R Gelman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08

4.  The discrimination of visual number.

Authors:  E L KAUFMAN; M W LORD
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1949-10

5.  The dependence of the visual numerosity limit on orientation, colour, and grouping in the stimulus.

Authors:  J Atkinson; M R Francis; F W Campbell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects.

Authors:  L Paquet; P M Merikle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity.

Authors:  F H Durgin; D R Proffitt; T J Olson; K S Reinke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.

Authors:  L M Trick; Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Anchoring effects on judgement, estimation, and discrimination of numerosity.

Authors:  T F Sawyer; N J Wesensten
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-02

10.  Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients.

Authors:  S Dehaene; L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sample size bias in the estimation of means.

Authors:  Andrew R Smith; Paul C Price
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Finding the subitizing in groupitizing: Evidence for parallel subitizing of dots and groups in grouped arrays.

Authors:  Theresa E Wege; Kelly Trezise; Matthew Inglis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.