Literature DB >> 12035887

Implicit motor learning through observational training in adults and children.

Annie Vinter1, Pierre Perruchet.   

Abstract

Although evidence of implicit motor learning on the basis of observation alone has been reported, there is some data to suggest that the phenomenon could be contaminated by the intentional exploitation of explicit knowledge. In the present experiment, a special procedure was adapted to study observational learning in a situation involving the acquisition of a new drawing behavior. The participants consisted of adults and children 6-10 years of age. The results provide support for the view that overt motor practice is not strictly necessary for implicit motor learning. They demonstrate that children display capacities similar to those of adults in this form of learning. Some suggestions are made to account for the contradictory results present in this area of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12035887     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations.

Authors:  J Rüsseler; F Rösler
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

2.  Implicit learning in children is not related to age: evidence from drawing behavior.

Authors:  A Vinter; P Perruchet
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

3.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.

Authors:  D B Willingham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  Serial pattern learning by event observation.

Authors:  J H Howard; S A Mutter; D V Howard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  On learning complex procedural knowledge.

Authors:  M A Stadler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Levels of analysis in motor control.

Authors:  R W Pew
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  On relations between perceiving, imagining and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences.

Authors:  S Vogt
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1995-05

9.  The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.

Authors:  M Ziessler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

Review 10.  How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives.

Authors:  J M Mandler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  13 in total

1.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  Learning by observation requires an early sleep window.

Authors:  Ysbrand D Van Der Werf; Els Van Der Helm; Menno M Schoonheim; Arne Ridderikhoff; Eus J W Van Someren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Disrupting the ventral premotor cortex interferes with the contribution of action observation to use-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Gabriela Cantarero; Joseph M Galea; Loni Ajagbe; Rachel Salas; Jeff Willis; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Artificial grammar learning in children: abstraction of rules or sensitivity to perceptual features?

Authors:  Arnaud Witt; Annie Vinter
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-03-25

5.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; David J M Kraemer; Antonia F de C Hamilton; William M Kelley; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration.

Authors:  J Liu; S C Cramer; D J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Developmental differences in effects of task pacing on implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Amanda S Hodel; Julie C Markant; Sara E Van Den Heuvel; Jenie M Cirilli-Raether; Kathleen M Thomas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-25

8.  Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairments Show Less Driving Errors after a Multiple Sessions Simulator Training Program but Do Not Exhibit Long Term Retention.

Authors:  Normand Teasdale; Martin Simoneau; Lisa Hudon; Mathieu Germain Robitaille; Thierry Moszkowicz; Denis Laurendeau; Louis Bherer; Simon Duchesne; Carol Hudon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Sequence Learning Under Uncertainty in Children: Self-Reflection vs. Self-Assertion.

Authors:  Christiane Lange-Küttner; Bruno B Averbeck; Silvia V Hirsch; Isabel Wießner; Nishtha Lamba
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-03

10.  How explicit and implicit test instructions in an implicit learning task affect performance.

Authors:  Arnaud Witt; Ira Puspitawati; Annie Vinter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.