Literature DB >> 1402708

Serial pattern learning by event observation.

J H Howard1, S A Mutter, D V Howard.   

Abstract

Serial pattern learning was investigated in a variation of the task introduced by Nissen and Bullemer (1987). We presented an asterisk at 1 of 4 spatial locations on each trial, and Ss either responded with a keypress or observed the event. The first 4 blocks contained 10 repetitions of a 10- or 16-element pattern, and the 5th block contained a random sequence. The difference in response time on the 5th random block and the previous patterned block served as an indirect measure of pattern learning. A direct measure was obtained in a final test block in which Ss predicted the next asterisk position. Equivalent learning occurred for responding and observing with indirect measures, but observation was superior with direct measures. These findings indicate that knowledge of serial order can develop through simple perceptual experience, and this is more available to deliberate recall than is knowledge acquired while responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1402708     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  35 in total

1.  Saccadic latency during perceptual processing and sequence learning.

Authors:  J G May; M L Berg; L A Zebley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.

Authors:  D B Willingham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: evidence for the primacy of response predictions.

Authors:  Joachim Hoffmann; Claudia Martin; Annette Schilling
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-08

5.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

7.  Nonintentional task set activation: evidence from implicit task sequence learning.

Authors:  Alex Gotler; Nachshon Meiran; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

8.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules.

Authors:  Hillary Schwarb; Eric H Schumacher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

Review 10.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.