Literature DB >> 21563888

Disrupting the ventral premotor cortex interferes with the contribution of action observation to use-dependent plasticity.

Gabriela Cantarero1, Joseph M Galea, Loni Ajagbe, Rachel Salas, Jeff Willis, Pablo Celnik.   

Abstract

Action observation (AO), observing another individual perform an action, has been implicated in several higher cognitive processes including forming basic motor memories. Previous work has shown that physical practice (PP) results in cortical motor representational changes, referred to as use-dependent plasticity (UDP), and that AO combined with PP potentiates UDP in both healthy adults and stroke patients. In humans, AO results in activation of the ventral premotor cortex (PMv), however, whether this PMv activation has a functional contribution to UDP is not known. Here, we studied the effects disruption of PMv has on UDP when subjects performed PP combined with AO (PP + AO). Subjects participated in two randomized crossover sessions measuring the amount of UDP resulting from PP + AO while receiving disruptive (1 Hz) TMS over the fMRI-activated PMv or over frontal cortex (Sham). We found that, unlike the sham session, disruptive TMS over PMv reduced the beneficial contribution of AO to UDP. To ensure that disruption of PMv was specifically interfering with the contribution of AO and not PP, subjects completed two more control sessions where they performed only PP while receiving disruptive TMS over PMv or frontal cortex. We found that the magnitude of UDP for both control sessions was similar to PP + AO with TMS over PMv. These findings suggest that the fMRI activation found in PMv during AO studies is functionally relevant to task performance, at least for the beneficial effects that AO exerts over motor training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21563888      PMCID: PMC3638076          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  42 in total

1.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.

Authors:  M Brass; H Bekkering; W Prinz
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-01

2.  Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action.

Authors:  N Nishitani; R Hari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study.

Authors:  H H Ehrsson; A Fagergren; T Jonsson; G Westling; R S Johansson; H Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cortical mechanism for the visual guidance of hand grasping movements in the monkey: A reversible inactivation study.

Authors:  L Fogassi; V Gallese; G Buccino; L Craighero; L Fadiga; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Differential fronto-parietal activation depending on force used in a precision grip task: an fMRI study.

Authors:  H H Ehrsson; E Fagergren; H Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Motor facilitation following action observation: a behavioural study in prehensile action.

Authors:  Martin G Edwards; Glyn W Humphreys; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study.

Authors:  G Buccino; F Binkofski; G R Fink; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese; R J Seitz; K Zilles; G Rizzolatti; H J Freund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions.

Authors:  Roy Mukamel; Arne D Ekstrom; Jonas Kaplan; Marco Iacoboni; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Human brain activity in the control of fine static precision grip forces: an fMRI study.

Authors:  J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; H H Ehrsson; H Forssberg
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  C M Bütefisch; B C Davis; S P Wise; L Sawaki; L Kopylev; J Classen; L G Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Increased use-dependent plasticity in chronic insomnia.

Authors:  Rachel E Salas; Joseph M Galea; Alyssa A Gamaldo; Charlene E Gamaldo; Richard P Allen; Michael T Smith; Gabriela Cantarero; Barbara D Lam; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Occlusion of LTP-like plasticity in human primary motor cortex by action observation.

Authors:  Jean-François Lepage; Olivier Morin-Moncet; Vincent Beaulé; Louis de Beaumont; Francois Champoux; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2013-04-30

4.  The frames of reference of the motor-visual aftereffect.

Authors:  Guido Barchiesi; Susan Wache; Luigi Cattaneo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of the actions observed on cervical motion in patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lucía de-la-Puente-Ranea; Beatriz García-Calvo; Roy La Touche; Josué Fernández-Carnero; Alfonso Gil-Martínez
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-31

6.  Enhanced Upper Extremity Functions with a Single Session of Action-Observation-Execution and Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program in Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Shambhu Prasad Adhikari; Jarugool Tretriluxana; Pakaratee Chaiyawat; Chutima Jalayondeja
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2018-06-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.