Literature DB >> 2530306

On learning complex procedural knowledge.

M A Stadler1.   

Abstract

Lewicki, Czyzewska, and Hoffman (1987) demonstrated learning without awareness in a visual search task. Rules determined target location on every seventh trial on the basis of target locations in the preceding six trials. Learning was demonstrated by negative transfer effects when the rules were changed. When questioned afterwards, the subjects could not describe the rules and denied awareness of them. This experiment was designed to replicate that of Lewicki et al. and to test several hypotheses about this apparent learning without awareness. Transfer conditions were included to determine whether rule learning was primarily perceptual or motor. The present assessment of awareness was based on an objective definition of awareness, rather than a subjective definition as in Lewicki et al.'s study. Their effect was replicated, and the transfer conditions revealed that learning relied on perceptual aspects of the task. The objective measure of awareness provided further evidence that subjects were unaware of the rules.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2530306     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  34 in total

1.  The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing.

Authors:  A T Hsiao; A S Reber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: electrophysiological indicators.

Authors:  F Schlaghecken; B Stürmer; M Eimer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

3.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.

Authors:  D B Willingham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Sakai; Katsuya Kitaguchi; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: evidence for the primacy of response predictions.

Authors:  Joachim Hoffmann; Claudia Martin; Annette Schilling
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-08

6.  Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

7.  Nonintentional task set activation: evidence from implicit task sequence learning.

Authors:  Alex Gotler; Nachshon Meiran; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

8.  Toward an "Awareness" of the Relationship between Task Performance and Own Verbal Accounts of that Performance.

Authors:  Frank Hammonds
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2006

9.  Pure perceptual-based learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order sequential probabilities.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-09-15

10.  Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules.

Authors:  Hillary Schwarb; Eric H Schumacher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.