Literature DB >> 7824683

The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.

M Ziessler1.   

Abstract

Subjects are able to learn even very complex serial patterns in serial-reaction-time tasks. The investigation of the learning processes behind this phenomenon has yielded contradictory results. Some studies have come to the conclusion the subjects had learned the sequence of stimuli. Other studies have assumed that the sequence of responses had been learned or a combination of both stimuli and responses. The present experiments stress the impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning. The subjects had to respond to serial targets that were presented within a matrix of distractors. The position of each target could be predicted from the identity and position of the previous target. If the subjects were to learn this pattern, they would be able to speed up the search for the target and give faster responses. The results indicated that the relation between the target identity and the position of the next target was acquired much better by those subjects who had to respond to each target with a special motor response. If the same response was required for the relevant targets, knowledge of the rule was somewhat fragmentary. To explain these results, mechanisms of motor learning and motor planning are discussed. It is assumed that learning of the rules occurs if the position changes appear to be effects of different motor responses.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7824683     DOI: 10.1007/bf00452993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  7 in total

1.  Serial pattern learning by event observation.

Authors:  J H Howard; S A Mutter; D V Howard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment?

Authors:  J J GIBSON; E J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Some conditions governing the use of the cue-producing response as an explanatory device.

Authors:  J DE RIVERA
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-05

4.  Effects of discrimination performance of similarity of previously acquired stimulus names.

Authors:  K J NORCROSS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-10

5.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  On learning complex procedural knowledge.

Authors:  M A Stadler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgment across trials.

Authors:  D R Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-03
  7 in total
  19 in total

1.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

2.  Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: electrophysiological indicators.

Authors:  F Schlaghecken; B Stürmer; M Eimer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

3.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.

Authors:  D B Willingham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: evidence for the primacy of response predictions.

Authors:  Joachim Hoffmann; Claudia Martin; Annette Schilling
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-08

5.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Nonintentional task set activation: evidence from implicit task sequence learning.

Authors:  Alex Gotler; Nachshon Meiran; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 7.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

8.  Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  David J Marcus; Canan Karatekin; Steven Markiewicz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

9.  Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures.

Authors:  Natacha Deroost; Eric Soetens
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-12-21

10.  How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

Authors:  Gerald P McDonnell; Mark Mills; Leslie McCuller; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.