Literature DB >> 12000800

The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings.

James R Usherwood1, Charles P Ellington.   

Abstract

Recent work on flapping hawkmoth models has demonstrated the importance of a spiral 'leading-edge vortex' created by dynamic stall, and maintained by some aspect of spanwise flow, for creating the lift required during flight. This study uses propeller models to investigate further the forces acting on model hawkmoth wings in 'propeller-like' rotation ('revolution'). Steadily revolving model hawkmoth wings produce high vertical ( approximately lift) and horizontal ( approximately profile drag) force coefficients because of the presence of a leading-edge vortex. Both horizontal and vertical forces, at relevant angles of attack, are dominated by the pressure difference between the upper and lower surfaces; separation at the leading edge prevents 'leading-edge suction'. This allows a simple geometric relationship between vertical and horizontal forces and the geometric angle of attack to be derived for thin, flat wings. Force coefficients are remarkably unaffected by considerable variations in leading-edge detail, twist and camber. Traditional accounts of the adaptive functions of twist and camber are based on conventional attached-flow aerodynamics and are not supported. Attempts to derive conventional profile drag and lift coefficients from 'steady' propeller coefficients are relatively successful for angles of incidence up to 50 degrees and, hence, for the angles normally applicable to insect flight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12000800     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.11.1547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  32 in total

Review 1.  The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-03-04

2.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Qingfeng Huang; Xinyan Deng; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Allometry of hummingbird lifting performance.

Authors:  D L Altshuler; R Dudley; S M Heredia; J A McGuire
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Power reduction and the radial limit of stall delay in revolving wings of different aspect ratio.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Co-option of a motor-to-sensory histaminergic circuit correlates with insect flight biomechanics.

Authors:  Phillip D Chapman; Samual P Bradley; Erica J Haught; Kassandra E Riggs; Mouaz M Haffar; Kevin C Daly; Andrew M Dacks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  The role of the leading edge vortex in lift augmentation of steadily revolving wings: a change in perspective.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Span efficiency in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  The aerodynamic forces and pressure distribution of a revolving pigeon wing.

Authors:  James R Usherwood
Journal:  Exp Fluids       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.