Literature DB >> 18682361

Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Simon M Walker1, Adrian L R Thomas, Graham K Taylor.   

Abstract

Here, we present a suite of photogrammetric methods for reconstructing insect wing kinematics, to provide instantaneous topographic maps of the wing surface. We filmed tethered locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) and free-flying hoverflies (Eristalis tenax) using four high-speed digital video cameras. We digitized multiple natural features and marked points on the wings using manual and automated tracking. Epipolar geometry was used to identify additional points on the hoverfly wing outline which were anatomically indistinguishable. The cameras were calibrated using a bundle adjustment technique that provides an estimate of the error associated with each individual data point. The mean absolute three-dimensional measurement error was 0.11 mm for the locust and 0.03 mm for the hoverfly. The error in the angle of incidence was at worst 0.51 degrees (s.d.) for the locust and 0.88 degrees (s.d.) for the hoverfly. The results we present are of unprecedented spatio-temporal resolution, and represent the most detailed measurements of insect wing kinematics to date. Variable spanwise twist and camber are prominent in the wingbeats of both the species, and are of such complexity that they would not be adequately captured by lower resolution techniques. The role of spanwise twist and camber in insect flight has yet to be fully understood, and accurate insect wing kinematics such as we present here are required to be sure of making valid predictions about their aerodynamic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18682361      PMCID: PMC2658659          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  35 in total

1.  Three-dimensional hindlimb kinematics of water running in the plumed basilisk lizard (Basiliscus plumifrons).

Authors:  S Tonia Hsieh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann; Sanjay P Sane; Michael Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Locomotion with flexible propulsors: II. Computational modeling of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish.

Authors:  Rajat Mittal; Haibo Dong; Meliha Bozkurttas; Georgev Lauder; Peter Madden
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 2.956

4.  The relationship between 3-D kinematics and gliding performance in the southern flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans.

Authors:  Kristin L Bishop
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  A computational investigation of the three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamics of Drosophila hovering and maneuvering.

Authors:  Ravi Ramamurti; William C Sandberg
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Kinematic, aerodynamic and anatomical mechanisms in the slow, maneuvering flight of pigeons

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske; Douglas R Warrick; Christopher J Clark; Donald R Powers; Tyson L Hedrick; Gabriel A Hyder; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils.

Authors:  A B Kesel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The hind wing of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). III. A finite element analysis of a deployable structure.

Authors:  R C Herbert; P G Young; C W Smith; R J Wootton; K E Evans
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  21 in total

1.  Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Wing and body motion and aerodynamic and leg forces during take-off in droneflies.

Authors:  Mao Wei Chen; Yan Lai Zhang; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Qingfeng Huang; Xinyan Deng; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakata; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Collision-avoidance behaviors of minimally restrained flying locusts to looming stimuli.

Authors:  R W M Chan; F Gabbiani
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Deformable wing kinematics in the desert locust: how and why do camber, twist and topography vary through the stroke?

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Motor output and control input in flapping flight: a compact model of the deforming wing kinematics of manoeuvring hoverflies.

Authors:  Indira Nagesh; Simon M Walker; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Avian surface reconstruction in free flight with application to flight stability analysis of a barn owl and peregrine falcon.

Authors:  Nicholas E Durston; Xue Wan; Jian G Liu; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Operation of the alula as an indicator of gear change in hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  In vivo time-resolved microtomography reveals the mechanics of the blowfly flight motor.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Daniel A Schwyn; Rajmund Mokso; Martina Wicklein; Tonya Müller; Michael Doube; Marco Stampanoni; Holger G Krapp; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.