Literature DB >> 20154187

Allometry of hummingbird lifting performance.

D L Altshuler1, R Dudley, S M Heredia, J A McGuire.   

Abstract

Vertical lifting performance in 67 hummingbird species was studied across a 4000 m elevational gradient. We used the technique of asymptotic load-lifting to elicit maximum sustained muscle power output during loaded hovering flight. Our analysis incorporated direct measurements of maximum sustained load and simultaneous wingbeat kinematics, together with aerodynamic estimates of mass-specific mechanical power output, all within a robust phylogenetic framework for the Trochilidae. We evaluated key statistical factors relevant to estimating slopes for allometric relationships by performing analyses with and without phylogenetic information, and incorporating species-specific measurement error. We further examined allometric relationships at different elevations because this gradient represents a natural experiment for studying physical challenges to animal flight mechanics. Maximum lifting capacity (i.e. vertical force production) declined with elevation, but was either isometric or negatively allometric with respect to both body and muscle mass, depending on elevational occurrence of the corresponding taxa. Maximum relative muscle power output exhibited a negative allometry with respect to muscle mass, supporting theoretical predictions from muscle mechanics.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20154187      PMCID: PMC2821213          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.037002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  26 in total

1.  Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Scaling of maximum net force output by motors used for locomotion.

Authors:  James H Marden
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Hummingbird flight: sustaining the highest mass-specific metabolic rates among vertebrates.

Authors:  R K Suarez
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1992-06-15

4.  Unifying constructal theory for scale effects in running, swimming and flying.

Authors:  Adrian Bejan; James H Marden
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Upper limits to mass-specific metabolic rates.

Authors:  R K Suarez
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.318

6.  Molecules, muscles, and machines: universal performance characteristics of motors.

Authors:  James H Marden; Lee R Allen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  From damselflies to pterosaurs: how burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size.

Authors:  J H Marden
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-04

8.  Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The mechanical power output of the flight muscles of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis) during take-off.

Authors:  G N Askew; R L Marsh; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Charles P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  13 in total

1.  Neuromuscular control of wingbeat kinematics in Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Kenneth C Welch; Brian H Cho; Danny B Welch; Amy F Lin; William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Flying in the rain: hovering performance of Anna's hummingbirds under varied precipitation.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Ortega-Jimenez; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Evolution of avian flight: muscles and constraints on performance.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Flapping before Flight: High Resolution, Three-Dimensional Skeletal Kinematics of Wings and Legs during Avian Development.

Authors:  Ashley M Heers; David B Baier; Brandon E Jackson; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Outperforming hummingbirds' load-lifting capability with a lightweight hummingbird-like flapping-wing mechanism.

Authors:  Frederik Leys; Dominiek Reynaerts; Dirk Vandepitte
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Burst muscle performance predicts the speed, acceleration, and turning performance of Anna's hummingbirds.

Authors:  Paolo S Segre; Roslyn Dakin; Victor B Zordan; Michael H Dickinson; Andrew D Straw; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  The biomechanical origin of extreme wing allometry in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Dimitri A Skandalis; Paolo S Segre; Joseph W Bahlman; Derrick J E Groom; Kenneth C Welch; Christopher C Witt; Jimmy A McGuire; Robert Dudley; David Lentink; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Limits to load-lifting performance in a passerine bird: the effects of intraspecific variation in morphological and kinematic parameters.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Yuan Yin; Shiyong Ge; Mo Li; Qian Zhang; Juyong Li; Yuefeng Wu; Dongming Li; Robert Dudley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.