Literature DB >> 15034660

The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight.

Fritz-Olaf Lehmann1.   

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed a diverse array of fluid dynamic phenomena that enhance lift production during flapping insect flight. Physical and analytical models of oscillating wings have demonstrated that a prominent vortex attached to the wing's leading edge augments lift production throughout the translational parts of the stroke cycle, whereas aerodynamic circulation due to wing rotation, and possibly momentum transfer due to a recovery of wake energy, may increase lift at the end of each half stroke. Compared to the predictions derived from conventional steady-state aerodynamic theory, these unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms may account for the majority of total lift produced by a flying insect. In addition to contributing to the lift required to keep the insect aloft, manipulation of the translational and rotational aerodynamic mechanisms may provide a potent means by which a flying animal can modulate direction and magnitude of flight forces for manoeuvring flight control and steering behaviour. The attainment of flight, including the ability to control aerodynamic forces by the neuromuscular system, is a classic paradigm of the remarkable adaptability that flying insects have for utilising the principles of unsteady fluid dynamics. Applying these principles to biology broadens our understanding of how the diverse patterns of wing motion displayed by the different insect species have been developed throughout their long evolutionary history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15034660     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-004-0502-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  46 in total

1.  Structure, form, and function of flight in engineering and the living world.

Authors:  Ulla M Lindhe Norberg
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.804

Review 2.  Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control.

Authors:  G K Taylor
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-11

3.  Visual afferences to flight steering muscles controlling optomotor responses of the fly.

Authors:  M Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Dragonfly flight. II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight.

Authors:  JM Wakeling; CP Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Aerodynamics of flapping flight with application to insects.

Authors:  M F M OSBORNE
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The production of elevated flight force compromises manoeuvrability in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  F O Lehmann; M H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  Mao Sun; Jian Tang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Flight in Drosophila. II. Variations in stroke parameters and wing contour.

Authors:  S Vogel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Dragonfly flight. III. Lift and power requirements.

Authors:  JM Wakeling; CP Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  11 in total

1.  The interaction of positive and negative sensory feedback loops in dynamic regulation of a motor pattern.

Authors:  Jessica Ausborn; Harald Wolf; Wolfgang Stein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The influence of aspect ratio and stroke pattern on force generation of a bat-inspired membrane wing.

Authors:  Cosima Schunk; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Fish larvae exploit edge vortices along their dorsal and ventral fin folds to propel themselves.

Authors:  Gen Li; Ulrike K Müller; Johan L van Leeuwen; Hao Liu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Evolution of avian flight: muscles and constraints on performance.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Scaling of the performance of insect-inspired passive-pitching flapping wings.

Authors:  Kit Sum Wu; Jerome Nowak; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Authors:  Paul Broadley; Mostafa R A Nabawy; Mark K Quinn; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

8.  Clap-and-fling mechanism in a hovering insect-like two-winged flapping-wing micro air vehicle.

Authors:  Hoang Vu Phan; Thi Kim Loan Au; Hoon Cheol Park
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Morphological diversification has led to inter-specific variation in elastic wing deformation during flight in scarab beetles.

Authors:  Y Meresman; J F Husak; R Ben-Shlomo; G Ribak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Estimation of unsteady aerodynamics in the wake of a freely flying European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Hadar Ben-Gida; Adam Kirchhefer; Zachary J Taylor; Wayne Bezner-Kerr; Christopher G Guglielmo; Gregory A Kopp; Roi Gurka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.