Literature DB >> 22736891

The aerodynamic forces and pressure distribution of a revolving pigeon wing.

James R Usherwood1.   

Abstract

The aerodynamic forces acting on a revolving dried pigeon wing and a flat card replica were measured with a propeller rig, effectively simulating a wing in continual downstroke. Two methods were adopted: direct measurement of the reaction vertical force and torque via a forceplate, and a map of the pressures along and across the wing measured with differential pressure sensors. Wings were tested at Reynolds numbers up to 108,000, typical for slow-flying pigeons, and considerably above previous similar measurements applied to insect and hummingbird wing and wing models. The pigeon wing out-performed the flat card replica, reaching lift coefficients of 1.64 compared with 1.44. Both real and model wings achieved much higher maximum lift coefficients, and at much higher geometric angles of attack (43°), than would be expected from wings tested in a windtunnel simulating translating flight. It therefore appears that some high-lift mechanisms, possibly analogous to those of slow-flying insects, may be available for birds flapping with wings at high angles of attack. The net magnitude and orientation of aerodynamic forces acting on a revolving pigeon wing can be determined from the differential pressure maps with a moderate degree of precision. With increasing angle of attack, variability in the pressure signals suddenly increases at an angle of attack between 33° and 38°, close to the angle of highest vertical force coefficient or lift coefficient; stall appears to be delayed compared with measurements from wings in windtunnels.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22736891      PMCID: PMC3380271          DOI: 10.1007/s00348-008-0596-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Fluids        ISSN: 0723-4864            Impact factor:   2.480


  16 in total

1.  The aerodynamics of avian take-off from direct pressure measurements in Canada geese (Branta canadensis).

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Tyson L Hedrick; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The effect of advance ratio on the aerodynamics of revolving wings.

Authors:  William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering.

Authors:  T L Hedrick; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia).

Authors:  Angela M Berg; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The moment of inertia of bird wings and the inertial power requirement for flapping flight

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  The mechanical power requirements of avian flight.

Authors:  G N Askew; D J Ellerby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The mechanical power output of the pectoralis muscle of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis): the in vivo length cycle and its implications for muscle performance.

Authors:  G N Askew; R L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The mechanical power output of the flight muscles of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis) during take-off.

Authors:  G N Askew; R L Marsh; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Aerodynamics of flapping flight with application to insects.

Authors:  M F M OSBORNE
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles.

Authors:  C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Predicting power-optimal kinematics of avian wings.

Authors:  Ben Parslew
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Power reduction and the radial limit of stall delay in revolving wings of different aspect ratio.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  The role of the leading edge vortex in lift augmentation of steadily revolving wings: a change in perspective.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Ontogeny of lift and drag production in ground birds.

Authors:  Ashley M Heers; Bret W Tobalske; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Qualitative skeletal correlates of wing shape in extant birds (Aves: Neoaves).

Authors:  Tobin L Hieronymus
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Range of motion in the avian wing is strongly associated with flight behavior and body mass.

Authors:  V B Baliga; I Szabo; D L Altshuler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  A Quasi-Steady Lifting Line Theory for Insect-Like Hovering Flight.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowthe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents.

Authors:  T Alexander Dececchi; Hans C E Larsson; Michael B Habib
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.