Literature DB >> 19692394

Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings.

Liang Zhao1, Qingfeng Huang, Xinyan Deng, Sanjay P Sane.   

Abstract

Recent work on the aerodynamics of flapping flight reveals fundamental differences in the mechanisms of aerodynamic force generation between fixed and flapping wings. When fixed wings translate at high angles of attack, they periodically generate and shed leading and trailing edge vortices as reflected in their fluctuating aerodynamic force traces and associated flow visualization. In contrast, wings flapping at high angles of attack generate stable leading edge vorticity, which persists throughout the duration of the stroke and enhances mean aerodynamic forces. Here, we show that aerodynamic forces can be controlled by altering the trailing edge flexibility of a flapping wing. We used a dynamically scaled mechanical model of flapping flight (Re approximately 2000) to measure the aerodynamic forces on flapping wings of variable flexural stiffness (EI). For low to medium angles of attack, as flexibility of the wing increases, its ability to generate aerodynamic forces decreases monotonically but its lift-to-drag ratios remain approximately constant. The instantaneous force traces reveal no major differences in the underlying modes of force generation for flexible and rigid wings, but the magnitude of force, the angle of net force vector and centre of pressure all vary systematically with wing flexibility. Even a rudimentary framework of wing veins is sufficient to restore the ability of flexible wings to generate forces at near-rigid values. Thus, the magnitude of force generation can be controlled by modulating the trailing edge flexibility and thereby controlling the magnitude of the leading edge vorticity. To characterize this, we have generated a detailed database of aerodynamic forces as a function of several variables including material properties, kinematics, aerodynamic forces and centre of pressure, which can also be used to help validate computational models of aeroelastic flapping wings. These experiments will also be useful for wing design for small robotic insects and, to a limited extent, in understanding the aerodynamics of flapping insect wings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19692394      PMCID: PMC2842791          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  25 in total

Review 1.  The aerodynamics of insect flight.

Authors:  Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Passive cambering and flexible propulsors: cetacean flukes.

Authors:  Frank E Fish; Moira K Nusbaum; John T Beneski; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 2.956

3.  Smart engineering in the mid-carboniferous: how well could palaeozoic dragonflies Fly?

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Computational biological fluid dynamics: digitizing and visualizing animal swimming and flying.

Authors:  Hao Liu
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica.

Authors:  Brendan J Borrell; Jeremy A Goldbogen; Robert Dudley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila.

Authors:  Steven N Fry; Rosalyn Sayaman; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  A computational investigation of the three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamics of Drosophila hovering and maneuvering.

Authors:  Ravi Ramamurti; William C Sandberg
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments.

Authors:  Z Jane Wang; James M Birch; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The hind wing of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). I. Functional morphology and mode of operation.

Authors:  R J Wootton; K E Evans; R Herbert; C W Smith
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Charles P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  23 in total

1.  Ultrastructure of dragonfly wing veins: composite structure of fibrous material supplemented by resilin.

Authors:  Esther Appel; Lars Heepe; Chung-Ping Lin; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Scaling law and enhancement of lift generation of an insect-size hovering flexible wing.

Authors:  Chang-kwon Kang; Wei Shyy
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Improvement of the aerodynamic performance by wing flexibility and elytra--hind wing interaction of a beetle during forward flight.

Authors:  Tuyen Quang Le; Tien Van Truong; Soo Hyung Park; Tri Quang Truong; Jin Hwan Ko; Hoon Cheol Park; Doyoung Byun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakata; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Fundamentals of soft robot locomotion.

Authors:  M Calisti; G Picardi; C Laschi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  On the quasi-steady aerodynamics of normal hovering flight part I: the induced power factor.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Analytical model for instantaneous lift and shape deformation of an insect-scale flapping wing in hover.

Authors:  Chang-kwon Kang; Wei Shyy
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Fruit fly scale robots can hover longer with flapping wings than with spinning wings.

Authors:  Elliot W Hawkes; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Wing flexibility enhances load-lifting capacity in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.