Literature DB >> 23658113

Span efficiency in hawkmoths.

Per Henningsson1, Richard J Bomphrey.   

Abstract

Flight in animals is the result of aerodynamic forces generated as flight muscles drive the wings through air. Aerial performance is therefore limited by the efficiency with which momentum is imparted to the air, a property that can be measured using modern techniques. We measured the induced flow fields around six hawkmoth species flying tethered in a wind tunnel to assess span efficiency, ei, and from these measurements, determined the morphological and kinematic characters that predict efficient flight. The species were selected to represent a range in wingspan from 40 to 110 mm (2.75 times) and in mass from 0.2 to 1.5 g (7.5 times) but they were similar in their overall shape and their ecology. From high spatio-temporal resolution quantitative wake images, we extracted time-resolved downwash distributions behind the hawkmoths, calculating instantaneous values of ei throughout the wingbeat cycle as well as multi-wingbeat averages. Span efficiency correlated positively with normalized lift and negatively with advance ratio. Average span efficiencies for the moths ranged from 0.31 to 0.60 showing that the standard generic value of 0.83 used in previous studies of animal flight is not a suitable approximation of aerodynamic performance in insects.

Keywords:  aerodynamics; hawkmoth; insect; particle image velocimetry; wind tunnel

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23658113      PMCID: PMC3673148          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  14 in total

1.  Bat flight generates complex aerodynamic tracks.

Authors:  A Hedenström; L C Johansson; M Wolf; R von Busse; Y Winter; G R Spedding
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Vortex wake, downwash distribution, aerodynamic performance and wingbeat kinematics in slow-flying pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Melissa S Bowlin; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Time-varying span efficiency through the wingbeat of desert locusts.

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Tomographic particle image velocimetry of desert locust wakes: instantaneous volumes combine to reveal hidden vortex elements and rapid wake deformation.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Per Henningsson; Dirk Michaelis; David Hollis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Aerodynamics of gliding flight in common swifts.

Authors:  P Henningsson; A Hedenström
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Time-resolved vortex wake of a common swift flying over a range of flight speeds.

Authors:  P Henningsson; F T Muijres; A Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Digital particle image velocimetry measurements of the downwash distribution of a desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Graham K Taylor; Nicholas J Lawson; Adrian L R Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Actual and 'optimum' flight speeds: field data reassessed

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Charles P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Comparing aerodynamic efficiency in birds and bats suggests better flight performance in birds.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; L Christoffer Johansson; Melissa S Bowlin; York Winter; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  The power-speed relationship is U-shaped in two free-flying hawkmoths (Manducasexta).

Authors:  Kajsa Warfvinge; Marco KleinHeerenbrink; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Computational investigation of cicada aerodynamics in forward flight.

Authors:  Hui Wan; Haibo Dong; Kuo Gai
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Comparative system identification of flower tracking performance in three hawkmoth species reveals adaptations for dim light vision.

Authors:  Anna L Stöckl; Klara Kihlström; Steven Chandler; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  On the quasi-steady aerodynamics of normal hovering flight part I: the induced power factor.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Wake structure and kinematics in two insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Tatjana Y Hubel; Nickolay I Hristov; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Insect and insect-inspired aerodynamics: unsteadiness, structural mechanics and flight control.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Ramiro Godoy-Diana
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.186

7.  The complex aerodynamic footprint of desert locusts revealed by large-volume tomographic particle image velocimetry.

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Dirk Michaelis; Toshiyuki Nakata; Daniel Schanz; Reinhard Geisler; Andreas Schröder; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Wake development behind paired wings with tip and root trailing vortices: consequences for animal flight force estimates.

Authors:  Jan T Horstmann; Per Henningsson; Adrian L R Thomas; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Efficiency of lift production in flapping and gliding flight of swifts.

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Anders Hedenström; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Flight of the dragonflies and damselflies.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Toshiyuki Nakata; Per Henningsson; Huai-Ti Lin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.