Literature DB >> 11870442

Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Thomas M Link1, Volker Vieth, Julia Matheis, David Newitt, Ying Lu, Ernst J Rummeny, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare structure measures obtained from high-resolution MR images of the calcaneus and the distal radius with bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fracture status. High-resolution MR images of the calcaneus and radius were obtained in 24 post-menopausal women with spine fractures and 22 age-matched controls. Imaging was performed at 1.5 T using a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (slice thickness 1 mm, in-plane spatial resolution 195 x 195 microm(2)). Structure analysis was performed using parameters analogous to standard histomorphometry. Bone mineral density of the spine was obtained using quantitative CT and of the hip with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Significant differences between both patient groups were obtained with BMD and all structure parameters ( p<0.05). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine the diagnostic performance in differentiating both groups, the best results were found for BMD of the spine, one of the radial structure measures and a combination of the calcaneal structure measures. In this study BMD of the spine and structure measures of the distal radius were best suited to predict the osteoporotic fracture status of the spine. A combination of BMD and structure measures did not yield any additional information on fracture status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11870442     DOI: 10.1007/s003300101127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

Review 1.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture.

Authors:  Dorothy A Nelson; Mary S Megyesi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  In vivo magnetic resonance detects rapid remodeling changes in the topology of the trabecular bone network after menopause and the protective effect of estradiol.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli; Glenn A Ladinsky; Catherine Jones; Maria Benito; Jeremy Magland; Branimir Vasilic; Andra M Popescu; Babette Zemel; Andrew J Cucchiara; Alexander C Wright; Hee K Song; Punam K Saha; Helen Peachey; Peter J Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Bone microarchitecture is impaired in adolescent amenorrheic athletes compared with eumenorrheic athletes and nonathletic controls.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Taraneh Nazem; Dorota Chapko; Melissa Russell; Nara Mendes; Alexander P Taylor; Mary L Bouxsein; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Microarchitecture and bone quality in the human calcaneus: local variations of fabric anisotropy.

Authors:  Mohammad F Souzanchi; Paolo Palacio-Mancheno; Yury A Borisov; Luis Cardoso; Stephen C Cowin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo.

Authors:  R Krug; J Carballido-Gamio; A J Burghardt; G Kazakia; B H Hyun; B Jobke; S Banerjee; M Huber; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Implications of resolution and noise for in vivo micro-MRI of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Charles Q Li; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; X Edward Guo; X Henry Zhang; Branimir Vasilic; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.