Literature DB >> 23179228

Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Thomas Baum1, Melanie Kutscher, Dirk Müller, Christoph Räth, Felix Eckstein, Eva-Maria Lochmüller, Ernst J Rummeny, Thomas M Link, Jan S Bauer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the combination of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based bone mass and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based cortical and trabecular structural measures improves the prediction of radial bone strength. Thirty-eight left forearms were harvested from formalin-fixed human cadavers. Bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal radius were measured using DXA. Cortical and trabecular structural measures of the distal radius were computed in high-resolution 1.5T MR images. Cortical measures included average cortical thickness and cross-sectional area. Trabecular measures included morphometric and texture parameters. The forearms were biomechanically tested in a fall simulation to measure absolute radial bone strength (failure load). Relative radial bone strength was determined by dividing radial failure loads by age, body mass index, radius length, and average radius cross-sectional area, respectively. DXA derived BMC and BMD showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlations with absolute and relative radial bone strength (r ≤ 0.78). Correlation coefficients for cortical and trabecular structural measures with absolute and relative radial bone strength amounted up to r = 0.59 and r = 0.74, respectively, (p < 0.05). In combination with DXA-based bone mass, trabecular but not, cortical structural measures, added in multiple regression models significant (p < 0.05) information in predicting absolute and relative radial bone strength (up to R adj = 0.88). Thus, a combination of DXA-based bone mass and MRI-based trabecular structural measures most accurately predicted absolute and relative radial bone strength, whereas structural measures of the cortex did not provide significant additional information in combination with DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179228     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-012-0407-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  46 in total

Review 1.  NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 0.954

2.  Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?

Authors:  M Hudelmaier; V Kuhn; E M Lochmüller; H Well; M Priemel; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Quantitative ultrasond in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Francesca de Terlizzi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study.

Authors:  Charles H Chesnut; Sharmilla Majumdar; David C Newitt; Andrew Shields; Jan Van Pelt; Ellen Laschansky; Moise Azria; Audrey Kriegman; Melvin Olson; Erik F Eriksen; Linda Mindeholm
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Julia Matheis; David Newitt; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Gender differences in trabecular bone architecture of the distal radius assessed with magnetic resonance imaging and implications for mechanical competence.

Authors:  Martin Hudelmaier; A Kollstedt; E M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; F Eckstein; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Trabecular structure quantified with the MRI-based virtual bone biopsy in postmenopausal women contributes to vertebral deformity burden independent of areal vertebral BMD.

Authors:  Glenn A Ladinsky; Branimir Vasilic; Andra M Popescu; Michael Wald; Babette S Zemel; Peter J Snyder; Louise Loh; Hee Kwon Song; Punam K Saha; Alexander C Wright; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Risk factors and prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures.

Authors:  I A Dontas; C K Yiannakopoulos
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 9.  Osteoporosis epidemiology update.

Authors:  Zoe A Cole; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Multislice computed tomography of the distal radius metaphysis: relationship of cortical bone structure with gender, age, osteoporotic status, and mechanical competence.

Authors:  Harald M Bonel; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Harald Well; Volker Kuhn; Martin Hudelmaier; Maximilian Reiser; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  8 in total

1.  7 Tesla MRI of bone microarchitecture discriminates between women without and with fragility fractures who do not differ by bone mineral density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Yinxiao Liu; Cheng Chen; Kevin K Chu; Chamith S Rajapakse; Kenneth Egol; Ding Xia; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Estimating bone mineral density using MRI in medicine and dentistry: a literature review.

Authors:  Danielle Ayumi Nishimura; Isabela Goulart Gil Choi; Emiko Saita Arita; Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Assessment of alveolar bone marrow fat content using 15 T MRI.

Authors:  Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes; Ouri Cohen; Ming Zhao; Eduardo Massaharu Aoki; Rodrigo Alves Ribeiro; Lina Abu Nada; Claudio Costa; Emiko Saito Arita; Faleh Tamimi; Jerome L Ackerman
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21

4.  In Vivo Quantitative MR Imaging of Bound and Pore Water in Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Towards Estimating Arterial Diameter Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: A Computational Simulation and Tissue Phantom Analysis.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Gautam Anand; Andrew Lowe; Huiyang Zhang; Anubha Kalra
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  MRI-derived bound and pore water concentrations as predictors of fracture resistance.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Trabecular bone structure analysis of the spine using clinical MDCT: can it predict vertebral bone strength?

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Martin Gräbeldinger; Christoph Räth; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Rainer Burgkart; Janina M Patsch; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Use of MR-based trabecular bone microstructure analysis at the distal radius for osteoporosis diagnostics: a study in post-menopausal women with breast cancer and treated with aromatase inhibitor.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Vanadin Seifert-Klauss; Tsvetelina D Pencheva; Pia M Jungmann; Ernst J Rummeny; Dirk Müller; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-05-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.