Literature DB >> 22219533

Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.

Soyeon Kang1, Mark F O'Reilly, Christina L Fragale, Jeannie M Aguilar, Mandy Rispoli, Russell Lang.   

Abstract

The rates of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers were evaluated across 3 preference assessment formats (i.e., paired stimulus, multiple-stimulus without replacement, and free operant). The experimenter administered each assessment format 5 times in a random order for 7 children with developmental disabilities whose problem behavior was maintained by attention, tangible items, or escape. Results demonstrated different effects related to the occurrence of problem behavior, suggesting an interaction between function of problem behavior and assessment format. Implications for practitioners are discussed with respect to assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities who exhibit problem behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autism; developmental disability; ecological validity; preference assessment; problem behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22219533      PMCID: PMC3251285          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  16 in total

1.  Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.

Authors:  J S Lalli; T R Vollmer; P R Progar; C Wright; J Borrero; D Daniel; C H Barthold; K Tocco; W May
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; J Conners; M D Wallace
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

3.  Functional analysis and treatment of elopement across two school settings.

Authors:  Russell Lang; Tonya Davis; Mark O'Reilly; Wendy Machalicek; Mandy Rispoli; Jeff Sigafoos; Giulio Lancioni; April Regester
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03

4.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.

Authors:  Tiffany Kodak; Wayne W Fisher; Michael E Kelley; April Kisamore
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2009-03-26

6.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

7.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

8.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.

Authors:  B A Iwata; M F Dorsey; K J Slifer; K E Bauman; G S Richman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

9.  The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.

Authors:  J S Lalli; K Kates
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

10.  Problem behavior during preference assessments: an empirical analysis and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Soyeon Kang; Russell B Lang; Mark F O'Reilly; Tonya N Davis; Wendy Machalicek; Mandy J Rispoli; Jeffrey M Chan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.