Literature DB >> 10736356

Intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice: a genetic analysis.

A A Bachmanov1, M G Tordoff, G K Beauchamp.   

Abstract

In two-bottle preference tests with water and solutions of monosodium glutamate (MSG) and inosine-5'-monophosphate (IMP), mice from the C57BL/6ByJ inbred strain consumed more and had higher preferences for these solutions compared with mice from the 129/J strain. The C57BL/6ByJ mice consumed 300 mmol/L MSG in large amounts, which were comparable to intakes of highly preferred solutions of sweeteners. The strain differences in voluntary consumption of 300 mmol/L MSG depended at least in part on postingestive effects because prior experience with MSG influenced the expression of the strain difference in MSG acceptance. The strain difference in MSG acceptance was in the opposite direction to the strain difference in NaCl acceptance and was not affected by previous consumption of saccharin. Although the C57BL/6ByJ mice had higher avidity for both MSG and sweeteners than did the 129/J mice, there was no correlation between preferences for these solutions in the second hybrid generation (F(2)) derived from these two strains. Thus, the strain differences in MSG acceptance are not related to the strain differences in salty or sweet taste responsiveness and most likely represent specific umami taste responsiveness. High acceptance of MSG solutions by the C57BL/6ByJ mice was inherited as a recessive trait in the F(2) generation. Further genetic linkage analyses using the F(2) hybrids are being conducted to map chromosomal locations of genes determining the strain difference in MSG acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10736356      PMCID: PMC3644809          DOI: 10.1093/jn/130.4.935S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  14 in total

1.  Voluntary sodium chloride consumption by mice: differences among five inbred strains.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 2.  Responses to umami substances in taste bud cells innervated by the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; K Nakashima; A Fukuda; H Nishino; T Sugimura; A Hino; V Danilova; G Hellekant
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Basic properties of umami and effects on humans.

Authors:  S Yamaguchi
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1991-05

Review 4.  Quantitative analysis of amino acid oxidation and related gluconeogenesis in humans.

Authors:  R L Jungas; M L Halperin; J T Brosnan
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Peripheral neural basis for behavioural discrimination between glutamate and the four basic taste substances in mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1989

6.  Behavioral discrimination between glutamate and the four basic taste substances in mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1989

7.  Electrophysiological and behavioral studies on the taste of umami substances in the rat.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; R Matsuo; Y Fujimoto; I Fukunaga; A Miyasaka; T Imoto
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1991-05

8.  Consumption of electrolytes and quinine by mouse strains with different blood pressures.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; G Schlager; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1998-06-01

9.  Development and genetics of glutamate taste preference.

Authors:  G K Beauchamp; A Bachmanov; L J Stein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Taste effects of 'umami' substances in hamsters as studied by electrophysiological and conditioned taste aversion techniques.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; R Matsuo; Y Kiyomitsu; R Kitamura
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-06-07       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Taste perception of monosodium glutamate and inosine monophosphate by 129P3/J and C57BL/6ByJ mice.

Authors:  Yuko Murata; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-08-08

5.  Mice perceive synergistic umami mixtures as tasting sweet.

Authors:  Louis N Saites; Zachary Goldsmith; Jaron Densky; Vivian A Guedes; John D Boughter
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

7.  Gustatory neural responses to umami taste stimuli in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Genetics of intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Sens Neur       Date:  2001-01-01

Review 9.  Variation in umami perception and in candidate genes for the umami receptor in mice and humans.

Authors:  Noriatsu Shigemura; Shinya Shirosaki; Tadahiro Ohkuri; Keisuke Sanematsu; A A Shahidul Islam; Yoko Ogiwara; Misako Kawai; Ryusuke Yoshida; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Forty mouse strain survey of water and sodium intake.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.