Literature DB >> 6810399

Taste responses to neohesperidin dihydrochalcone in rats and baboon monkeys.

M Naim, H Rogatka, T Yamamoto, U Zehavi.   

Abstract

Preference-aversion behavior to solutions containing neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDHC) was studied rats and baboon monkeys. Electrophysiological responses evoked by application of NHDHC solutions to taste receptors innervated by the chorda tympani and the glossopharyngeal nerves were also measured. As a group, rats were indifferent to solutions containing up to 1.2 x 10(-3) M NHDHC in short and long-term preference tests. A solution containing the very high concentration of 8.2 x 10(-3) M NHDHC was consumed less than water by all rats. The aversive behavior of rats to the 8.2 x 10(-3) M NHDHC solution appeared to be due to taste quality rather than olfaction. When percent preferences were calculated on an individual basis for the long-term preference tests, 59% of the rats were indifferent to solutions containing up to 1.2 x 10(-3) M NHDHC, 33% of the animals found this solution aversive and less than 8% showed preference. Behavioral responses to a solution of 3.4 x 10(-4) M aspartame also varied considerably among rats. The electrophysiological data were in line with the behavioral responses suggesting weak taste responses for NHDHC in rats. More pronounced responses observed in the glossopharyngeal nerve as compared to the chorda tympani. Baboon monkeys showed a strong preference for solutions containing 1.6 x 10(-5) M-1.6 x 10(-3) M NHDHC. A solution of 1.6 x 10(-2) M was consumed to a lesser extent than water. It is concluded that baboon monkeys present a better experimental model than rats for investigating the sweetness of NHDHC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6810399     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90163-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

1.  Analyses of sweet receptor gene (Tas1r2) and preference for sweet stimuli in species of Carnivora.

Authors:  Xia Li; Dieter Glaser; Weihua Li; Warren E Johnson; Stephen J O'Brien; Gary K Beauchamp; Joseph G Brand
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Sweet taste receptor gene variation and aspartame taste in primates and other species.

Authors:  Xia Li; Alexander A Bachmanov; Kenji Maehashi; Weihua Li; Raymond Lim; Joseph G Brand; Gary K Beauchamp; Danielle R Reed; Chloe Thai; Wely B Floriano
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Sweet tastants stimulate adenylate cyclase coupled to GTP-binding protein in rat tongue membranes.

Authors:  B J Striem; U Pace; U Zehavi; M Naim; D Lancet
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Valine 738 and lysine 735 in the fifth transmembrane domain of rTas1r3 mediate insensitivity towards lactisole of the rat sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  Marcel Winnig; Bernd Bufe; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  The binding site for neohesperidin dihydrochalcone at the human sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  Marcel Winnig; Bernd Bufe; Nicole A Kratochwil; Jay P Slack; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2007-10-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.