Literature DB >> 11511892

Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.

H Geijer1, K W Beckman, T Andersson, J Persliden.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the image quality for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector at various radiation dose settings and to compare the results with storage phosphor plates and a screen-film system. A CDRAD 2.0 contrast-detail phantom was imaged with a flat-panel detector (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at three different dose levels with settings for intravenous urography. The same phantom was imaged with storage phosphor plates at a simulated system speed of 200 and a screen-film system with a system speed of 160. Entrance surface doses were recorded for all images. At each setting, three images were read by four independent observers. The flat-panel detector had equal image quality at less than half the radiation dose compared with storage phosphor plates. The difference was even larger when compared with film with the flat-panel detector having equal image quality at approximately one-fifth the dose. The flat-panel detector has a very favourable combination of image quality vs radiation dose compared with storage phosphor plates and screen film.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11511892     DOI: 10.1007/s003300100851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  12 in total

1.  The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  A Almén; A Tingberg; J Besjakov; S Mattsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Markus Völk; Okka W Hamer; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiation exposure of operator performing interventional procedures using a flat panel angiography system: evaluation with photoluminescence glass dosimeters.

Authors:  Yoshinori Funama; Nozomu Nagasue; Kazuo Awai; Ichiro Sakamoto; Kiyotaka Kakei; Masamichi Shimamura; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Masataka Uetani
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  A clinical evaluation of the image quality computer program, CoCIQ.

Authors:  E Norrman; M Gårdestig; J Persliden; H Geijer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Reducing dose in urography while maintaining image quality-a comparison of storage phosphor plates and a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Margareta Jansson; Håkan Geijer; Jan Persliden; Torbjörn Andersson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer; Lillemor Forsberg; Susanne Kheddache; Patrik Sund
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.

Authors:  Sadeq Al-Murshedi; Peter Hogg; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.

Authors:  G Compagnone; M Casadio Baleni; E Di Nicola; M Valentino; M Benati; L F Calzolaio; N Oberhofer; E Fabbri; S Domenichelli; L Barozzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  Uterine artery embolization for treatment of symptomatic fibroids: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Kavous Firouznia; Hossein Ghanaati; Amir Hossein Jalali; Madjid Shakiba
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 0.611

10.  Comparing ovarian radiation doses in flat-panel and conventional angiography during uterine artery embolization: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kavous Firouznia; Hossein Ghanaati; Aliakbar Sharafi; Firouze Abahashemi; Hassan Hashemi; Amir Hossein Jalali; Madjid Shakiba
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 0.212

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.