Literature DB >> 20661692

Radiation exposure of operator performing interventional procedures using a flat panel angiography system: evaluation with photoluminescence glass dosimeters.

Yoshinori Funama1, Nozomu Nagasue, Kazuo Awai, Ichiro Sakamoto, Kiyotaka Kakei, Masamichi Shimamura, Yasuyuki Yamashita, Masataka Uetani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using glass rod dosimeters we investigated the radiation dose to the operator performing interventional procedures in 43 patients with the aid of a monoplane flat detector-based angiography system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the procedures we recorded the number of radiographic frames and the radiographic conditions. After treatment we recorded the fluoroscopy time and the fluoroscopic, radiographic, and total air kerma. To obtain the total operator exposure dose we took measurements at five sites: left orbital fossa, thyroid, left hand, left chest, and pubic symphysis.
RESULTS: The mean operator exposure dose to the left hand was higher than at the other sites we measured; it was 387.0, 209.6, 174.3, and 237.1 microGy for the stentgraft, percutaneous transluminal arteriography, transarterial chemoembolization, and hepatic infusion port placement procedures. There was a positive correlation between the fluoroscopic and radiographic air kerma value and the operator exposure dose at the left orbital fossa, thyroid, and left hand.
CONCLUSION: The operator exposure dose correlated with the radiographic and fluoroscopic air kerma. Exposure of the operator's left hand was higher than at the other sites studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661692     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0444-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  16 in total

1.  Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.

Authors:  M Strotzer; M Völk; T Wild; P von Landenberg; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Significant reduction of radiation exposure to operator and staff during cardiac interventions by analysis of radiation leakage and improved lead shielding.

Authors:  Eberhard Kuon; Moritz Schmitt; Johannes B Dahm
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Lens of the eye: radiation dose in balloon dacryocystoplasty.

Authors:  E T Ilgit; N Meric; D Bor; I Oznur; O Konus; S Isik
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Radiation dose to patients and radiologists during transcatheter arterial embolization: comparison of a digital flat-panel system and conventional unit.

Authors:  Shigeru Suzuki; Shigeru Furui; Ikuo Kobayashi; Teiyu Yamauchi; Hiroshi Kohtake; Koji Takeshita; Koichi Takada; Masafumi Yamagishi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Christof H Weber; Stefan Wirth; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian F Reiser; Marcus Treitl
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Dose-area product of patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA): abdominal aorta and lower limb examinations.

Authors:  R Juszkat; M A Blaszak; N Majewska; W Majewski
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Patrick T Noonan; Jeffrey D Georgia
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization.

Authors:  B Nikolic; J B Spies; M J Lundsten; S Abbara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Influence of flat-panel fluoroscopic equipment variables on cardiac radiation doses.

Authors:  Edward L Nickoloff; Zheng Feng Lu; Ajoy Dutta; James So; Stephen Balter; Jeffrey Moses
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Entrance skin dose estimates derived from dose-area product measurements in interventional radiological procedures.

Authors:  B J McParland
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effectiveness of additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy in protecting staff from scatter radiation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Authors:  Yoshiaki Morishima; Koichi Chida; Yoshiaki Katahira
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.