Literature DB >> 15827822

A clinical evaluation of the image quality computer program, CoCIQ.

E Norrman1, M Gårdestig, J Persliden, H Geijer.   

Abstract

To provide an objective way of measuring image quality, a computer program was designed that automatically analyzes the test images of a contrast-detail (CD) phantom. The program gives a quantified measurement of image quality by calculating an Image Quality Figure (IQF). The aim of this work was to evaluate the program and adjust it to clinical situations in order to find the detectable level where the program gives a reliable figure of the contrast resolution. The program was applied on a large variety of images with lumbar spine and urographic parameters, from very low to very high image qualities. It was shown that the computer program produces IQFs with small variations and there were a strong linear statistical relation between the computerized evaluation and the evaluation performed by human observers (R2= 0.98). This method offers a fast and easy way of conducting image quality evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827822      PMCID: PMC3046702          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-004-1036-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.

Authors:  H Geijer; K W Beckman; T Andersson; J Persliden
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  S Kheddache; L G Månsson; J E Angelhed; L Denbratt; B Gottfridsson; D Schlossman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Objective assessment of phantom image quality in mammography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  A D Castellano Smith; I A Castellano Smith; D R Dance
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems.

Authors:  C E Metz; R F Wagner; K Doi; D G Brown; R M Nishikawa; K J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study.

Authors:  X J Rong; C C Shaw; X Liu; M R Lemacks; S K Thompson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Development of a randomised contrast detail digital phantom for observer detectability study.

Authors:  Ms Nizam; Kh Ng; Bjj Abdullah
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-07-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.