Literature DB >> 11495119

The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

J Ivanoff1, R M Klein.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the performance disadvantage for targets presented at an exogenously cued location, relative to an uncued location, at relatively long cue-target onset asynchronies. In this experiment, we investigated the influence on IOR of a nonresponding effector (i.e., the index finger of the nonresponding hand) placed on a response key in a simple-RT task. With peripheral cues and targets, IOR and spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects were larger when the nonresponding hand was placed on a response key. IOR--the slowed responding to go signals at the cued location--was accompanied by a lower false alarm rate when no-go signals were presented there. These findings provide direct evidence for a motoric component to IOR wherein some portion of the inhibition is observed as a criterion shift against responding to the cued location.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495119     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible.

Authors:  Y Takeda; A Yagi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

3.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

4.  Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset.

Authors:  L Riggio; A Bello; C Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1998

5.  Disinhibition of return: unnecessary and unlikely.

Authors:  R M Klein; W C Schmidt; H J Müller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-07

6.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

7.  Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion.

Authors:  W C Schmidt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

8.  Relationship between inhibition and facilitation following a visual cue.

Authors:  C A Possamai
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-04

9.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.

Authors:  G Tassinari; S Aglioti; L Chelazzi; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Authors:  R D Rafal; P A Calabresi; C W Brennan; T K Sciolto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  12 in total

1.  Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; G R Mangun
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Response priming with apparent motion primes.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-20

4.  The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Daniel Barnes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-24

6.  Contingent capture and inhibition of return: a comparison of mechanisms.

Authors:  William Prinzmetal; Jordan A Taylor; Loretta Barry Myers; Jacqueline Nguyen-Espino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  On the nature of the delayed "inhibitory" cueing effects generated by uninformative arrows at fixation.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Jason Satel; Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

8.  Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of return effect in exogenous orienting.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Shuxia Yao; Cody Ding; Senqing Qi; Yan Lei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects.

Authors:  Alfred Lim; Vivian Eng; Steve M J Janssen; Jason Satel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  On observing another person's actions: influences of observed inhibition and errors.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.