Literature DB >> 10069033

Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.

J Pratt1, R A Abrams.   

Abstract

Although inhibition of return is known to affect a wide range of detection tasks, it has not been found consistently in discrimination tasks. To examine this issue, 5 experiments were conducted in which participants discriminated between a visual target and a distractor. The responses were not inhibited if, before the onset of stimuli, attention had been overtly oriented (i.e., an eye movement was made) to the future target location and the stimulus at that location was the same symbol as the upcoming target. However, if attention was covertly oriented (i.e., no eye movement was made) to the future location of the target, or if the stimulus at the earlier attended location was a symbol different from the target, responses to the target were inhibited. Overall, the findings provide insights into the relation between movements of attention and discrimination judgments and support the notion that inhibition of return is an attentional phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10069033     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.1.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  J Pratt; J Hillis; J M Gold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.

Authors:  Alexa B Roggeveen; David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial.

Authors:  Ellen M M Jongen; Fren T Y Smulders
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-19

8.  Multiple sources of positive- and negative-priming effects: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Henning Gibbons; Thomas H Rammsayer; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

9.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08

10.  Closed head injury and perceptual processing in dual-task situations.

Authors:  G Hein; T Schubert; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.