Literature DB >> 10997039

Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible.

Y Takeda1, A Yagi.   

Abstract

Klein (1988) reported that inhibitory tagging (i.e., inhibition of return in visual search) made reaction times for the detection of small probes increase at locations where there had previously been rejected items in serial visual search. It is reasonable that the attended and rejected locations are inhibited. However, subsequent studies did not support Klein's idea. In these studies, inhibitory tagging was tested after removing the items from the search tasks. The paradigms in these studies were not appropriate for testing an object-based inhibitory effect because the objects (i.e., items) were removed from the display. In the present study, we found that evidence of inhibitory tagging could be observed only when the items of the search tasks were maintained until the responses for the small probes were made. This appeared to be an object-based effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10997039     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  34 in total

1.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Testing a conceptual locus for the inconsistent object change detection advantage in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; John M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

3.  Search for multiple targets: evidence for memory-based control of attention.

Authors:  Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

4.  Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; Caroline Decaix; Eric Siéroff; Sylvie Chokron; Bruce Milliken; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Mathew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

6.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Inhibition of object identity in inhibition of return: implications for encoding and retrieving inhibitory processes.

Authors:  Sarah Grison; Matthew A Paul; Klaus Kessler; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

8.  Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Michael S Ambinder; Brendon Hsieh; Brian Levinthal; James A Crowell; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Alejandro Lleras; Daniel J Simons; Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

9.  Inhibition of return lasts longer at repeatedly stimulated locations than at novel locations.

Authors:  Hsuan-Fu Chao; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

10.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.