Literature DB >> 17694921

The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR.

Thomas M Spalek1, Vincent Di Lollo.   

Abstract

In an inhibition of return (IOR) paradigm, we used a threshold-tracking procedure combined with backward masking to measure the speed of perceptual processing in IOR independent of motoric factors. Instead of the conventional reaction time measure, this procedure yielded the critical exposure duration (DURc) that is required in order for a target to be identified reliably before the onset of a trailing mask. In Experiment 1, the facilitation effects conventionally found at short cue-target onset asynchrony (CTOA) were evidenced by shorter values of DURc at cued relative to uncued locations. Conversely, the retardation effects conventionally found at long CTOA were evidenced by correspondingly longer values of DURc. In Experiment 2, the DURc results strongly suggest that the directional reading bias previously observed in IOR studies is due, at least in part, to perceptual rather than motoric factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694921     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Supporting the attentional momentum view of IOR: is attention biased to go right?

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Sherief Hammad
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-02

3.  Inhibition of return from stimulus to response.

Authors:  David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

4.  The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Sherief Hammad
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-01

5.  Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays.

Authors:  H J Müller; A von Mühlenen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

6.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.

Authors:  R A Abrams; R S Dobkin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Fixation disengagement and eye-movement latency.

Authors:  W J Tam; H Ono
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-09
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of return effect in exogenous orienting.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Shuxia Yao; Cody Ding; Senqing Qi; Yan Lei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Xueli Wang; Xing Peng; Qi Li; Chi Zhang; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.