Literature DB >> 9689907

Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset.

L Riggio1, A Bello, C Umiltà.   

Abstract

The response speed to a visual target is modulated by the position of previous events (cues) even if their position is not predictive of the target position. The modulation has been considered biphasic, with an early facilitatory and a later inhibitory component. We conducted three experiments that investigated the importance of the onset and offset features of the cue for the facilitatory and inhibitory effects and estimated their separate and joint effects. The two possible target locations, one in the right and one in the left visual field, were indicated by two empty boxes, and the cue consisted of the onset and/or offset of an arrowhead located just under one of the two boxes. Different time intervals were used between cue and target. Subjects were instructed to ignore the cue and to respond to the target (a cross inside one of the two boxes). The data showed only consistent effects of inhibition (inhibition of return) with the long intervals, but the pattern was different depending on the cue type. The amount of inhibition was much greater when the onset of the cue was followed by its offset. Apparently, inhibition of return depended on the dynamic changes of the cue.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9689907     DOI: 10.1007/s004260050017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  12 in total

1.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

3.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

4.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

5.  Time-dependent effects of discrete spatial cues on the planning of directed movements.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pellizzer; James H Hedges; Ramon R Villanueva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

7.  Better late than never: how onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit.

Authors:  Larissa Vingilis-Jaremko; Susanne Ferber; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-07-24

8.  Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Juan Lupiáñez; Xiaolan Fu; Xuchu Weng
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-08-20

9.  Left visual neglect: is the disengage deficit space- or object-based?

Authors:  Federica Rastelli; Maria-Jesus Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Christophe Duret; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The Effect of Ratio of Changing to Static Stimuli on the Attentional Capture.

Authors:  Fuminori Ono
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.