Literature DB >> 11464561

Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark.

A H Wertheim1, B S Mesland, W Bles.   

Abstract

On the basis of models of otolith functioning, one would expect that, during sinusoidal linear self-motion in darkness, percepts of body tilt are experienced. However, this is normally not the case, which suggests that the otoliths are not responsive to small deviations from the vertical of the gravito-inertial force vector acting on them. Here we show that this is incorrect. Subjects usually know on what kind of linear motion device they are (going to be) moved, having seen it prior to experimentation. This may result in a cognitive suppression of such otolith responses. In the present study, subjects were kept completely unaware of how they were moved and were asked to report on how they thought they moved. About 50% of the reports included tilt percepts almost immediately. It is concluded that this reveals the presence of otolith responsiveness to even small and short-lived deviations of the gravito-inertial force vector from verticality, a responsiveness which is suppressed when (prior) cognitions exist that the motion path is purely in the horizontal plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11464561     DOI: 10.1068/p3092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  23 in total

1.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues.

Authors:  Jérôme Carriot; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Vincent Nougier; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motion perception during variable-radius swing motion in darkness.

Authors:  A A Rader; C M Oman; D M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Constructive perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Gin McCollum
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Integration of visual and inertial cues in the perception of angular self-motion.

Authors:  K N de Winkel; F Soyka; M Barnett-Cowan; H H Bülthoff; E L Groen; P J Werkhoven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perception of the dynamic visual vertical during sinusoidal linear motion.

Authors:  A Pomante; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Vestibular cognition: the effect of prior belief on vestibular perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Andrew W Ellis; Manuel P Klaus; Fred W Mast
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.