Literature DB >> 16604316

Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues.

Jérôme Carriot1, Pierre-Alain Barraud, Vincent Nougier, Corinne Cian.   

Abstract

Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration is generally attributed to the otolithic system which reflects either a translation of the head or a reorientation of the head with respect to gravity (tilt/translation ambiguity). The main aim of this study was to compare the tilt perception during prolonged static tilt and translation between 8 and 20 degrees of tilt relative to the gravitoinertial forces (i.e., G and GIF, respectively) when the semicircular cues were no more available. An indirect measure of tilt perception was estimated by means of a visual and kinesthetic judgment of the gravitational horizon. The main results contrast with the interpretation regarding the tilt/translation ambiguity as the same orientation relative to the shear forces G for the true tilt or GIF in the centrifuge did not induce the same horizon perception. Visual adjustment and arm pointing in the centrifuge were always above the ones observed in a G environment. Part of the lowering of the judgment in the centrifuge may be related to the mechanical effect of GIF on the effectors as shown by the shift of the egocentric coordinates in the direction of GIF. The role of the extravestibular graviceptors in the judgment of the degree of tilt of one's own body relative to G or GIF was discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16604316     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0434-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

1.  Relationship between perceptual style and reactivity to motion.

Authors:  G M Long; R K Ambler; F E Guedry
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark.

Authors:  A H Wertheim; B S Mesland; W Bles
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  VISUAL ILLUSIONS OF MOVEMENT.

Authors:  T C WHITESIDE; A GRAYBIEL; J I NIVEN
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Oculogravic illusion.

Authors:  A GRAYBIEL
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1952-11

5.  Perceived body orientation in microgravity: effects of prior experience and pressure under the feet.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; Lionel Bringoux; Corinne Charles; Franck Mars; Vincent Nougier; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2004-09

6.  Interacting vestibular stimuli and nystagmic habituation.

Authors:  J H Brown
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1966 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Perceptual thresholds of radial accelerations as indicated by visually perceived eye level.

Authors:  C Raphel; P A Barraud
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1994-03

8.  Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.

Authors:  W Li; L Matin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

9.  Subjective postural orientation and visual vertical during slow pitch tilt for the seated human subject.

Authors:  Y Ito; M A Gresty
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1997-01

10.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  Spatial localization investigated by continuous pointing during visual and gravitoinertial changes.

Authors:  C Scotto Di Cesare; L Bringoux; C Bourdin; F R Sarlegna; D R Mestre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Otolith signals contribute to inter-individual differences in the perception of gravity-centered space.

Authors:  C Cian; P A Barraud; A C Paillard; S Hidot; P Denise; J Ventre-Dominey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of multisensory graviceptive information on the apparent zenith.

Authors:  J Carriot; C Cian; A Paillard; P Denise; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Roll aftereffects: influence of tilt and inter-stimulus interval.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Perception of Upright: Multisensory Convergence and the Role of Temporo-Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Ariel Winnick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.