Literature DB >> 19705112

Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process.

Manuel Vidal1, Heinrich H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Many previous studies have focused on how humans combine inputs provided by different modalities for the same physical property. However, it is not yet very clear how different senses providing information about our own movements combine in order to provide a motion percept. We designed an experiment to investigate how upright turns are stored, and particularly how vestibular and visual cues interact at the different stages of the memorization process (encoding/recalling). Subjects experienced passive yaw turns stimulated in the vestibular modality (whole-body rotations) and/or in the visual modality (limited lifetime star-field rotations), with the visual scene turning 1.5 times faster when combined (unnoticed conflict). Then they were asked to actively reproduce the rotation displacement in the opposite direction, with body cues only, visual cues only, or both cues with either the same or a different gain factor. First, we found that in none of the conditions did the reproduced motion dynamics follow that of the presentation phase (Gaussian angular velocity profiles). Second, the unimodal recalling of turns was largely uninfluenced by the other sensory cue that it could be combined with during the encoding. Therefore, turns in each modality, visual, and vestibular are stored independently. Third, when the intersensory gain was preserved, the bimodal reproduction was more precise (reduced variance) and lay between the two unimodal reproductions. This suggests that with both visual and vestibular cues available, these combine in order to improve the reproduction. Fourth, when the intersensory gain was modified, the bimodal reproduction resulted in a substantially larger change for the body than for the visual scene rotations, which indicates that vision prevails for this rotation displacement task when a matching problem is introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19705112      PMCID: PMC2800859          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1980-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion.

Authors:  F Bremmer; M Lappe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark.

Authors:  A H Wertheim; B S Mesland; W Bles
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 3.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  On the sufficiency of the velocity field for perception of heading.

Authors:  W H Warren; A W Blackwell; K J Kurtz; N G Hatsopoulos; M L Kalish
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Traveled distances: new insights into the role of optic flow.

Authors:  Matteo Mossio; Manuel Vidal; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Spatial memory and path integration studied by self-driven passive linear displacement. I. Basic properties.

Authors:  I Israël; R Grasso; P Georges-Francois; T Tsuzuku; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Thresholds for the perception of whole body angular movement about a vertical axis.

Authors:  A J Benson; E C Hutt; S F Brown
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1989-03

9.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Martin S Banks; Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  5 in total

1.  Weightlessness alters up/down asymmetries in the perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Caty De Saedeleer; Manuel Vidal; Mark Lipshits; Ana Bengoetxea; Ana Maria Cebolla; Alain Berthoz; Guy Cheron; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Optimal visuotactile integration for velocity discrimination of self-hand movements.

Authors:  M Chancel; C Blanchard; M Guerraz; A Montagnini; A Kavounoudias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Rotational error in path integration: encoding and execution errors in angle reproduction.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Differential contributions of vision, touch and muscle proprioception to the coding of hand movements.

Authors:  Caroline Blanchard; Régine Roll; Jean-Pierre Roll; Anne Kavounoudias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Biases in the perception of self-motion during whole-body acceleration and deceleration.

Authors:  Luc Tremblay; Andrew Kennedy; Dany Paleressompoulle; Liliane Borel; Laurence Mouchnino; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.