Literature DB >> 11459951

Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination.

B Michel1, M J Flores, E Viguera, G Grompone, M Seigneur, V Bidnenko.   

Abstract

DNA synthesis is an accurate and very processive phenomenon; nevertheless, replication fork progression on chromosomes can be impeded by DNA lesions, DNA secondary structures, or DNA-bound proteins. Elements interfering with the progression of replication forks have been reported to induce rearrangements and/or render homologous recombination essential for viability, in all organisms from bacteria to human. Arrested replication forks may be the target of nucleases, thereby providing a substrate for double-strand break repair enzyme. For example in bacteria, direct fork breakage was proposed to occur at replication forks blocked by a bona fide replication terminator sequence, a specific site that arrests bacterial chromosome replication. Alternatively, an arrested replication fork may be transformed into a recombination substrate by reversal of the forked structures. In reversed forks, the last duplicated portions of the template strands reanneal, allowing the newly synthesized strands to pair. In bacteria, this reaction was proposed to occur in replication mutants, in which fork arrest is caused by a defect in a replication protein, and in UV irradiated cells. Recent studies suggest that it may also occur in eukaryote organisms. We will review here observations that link replication hindrance with DNA rearrangements and the possible underlying molecular processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459951      PMCID: PMC37419          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.111008798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  93 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of evolvability.

Authors:  M Radman; I Matic; F Taddei
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  Defending genome integrity during DNA replication: a proposed role for RecQ family helicases.

Authors:  R K Chakraverty; I D Hickson
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Sister chromatid exchanges are mediated by homologous recombination in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  E Sonoda; M S Sasaki; C Morrison; Y Yamaguchi-Iwai; M Takata; S Takeda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Analysis of DNA replication forks encountering a pyrimidine dimer in the template to the leading strand.

Authors:  M Cordeiro-Stone; A M Makhov; L S Zaritskaya; J D Griffith
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  The RecBC enzyme loads RecA protein onto ssDNA asymmetrically and independently of chi, resulting in constitutive recombination activation.

Authors:  J J Churchill; D G Anderson; S C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Duplex opening by primosome protein PriA for replisome assembly on a recombination intermediate.

Authors:  J M Jones; H Nakai
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06-11       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  The biochemistry and biological significance of nonhomologous DNA end joining: an essential repair process in multicellular eukaryotes.

Authors:  M R Lieber
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  When replication forks stop.

Authors:  H Bierne; B Michel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Elimination of replication block protein Fob1 extends the life span of yeast mother cells.

Authors:  P A Defossez; R Prusty; M Kaeberlein; S J Lin; P Ferrigno; P A Silver; R L Keil; L Guarente
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Biochemical interaction of the Escherichia coli RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins with RecA protein and single-stranded DNA binding protein.

Authors:  K Umezu; N W Chi; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  117 in total

1.  Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III.

Authors:  Thomas Caspari; Johanne M Murray; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  DNA end-binding specificity of human Rad50/Mre11 is influenced by ATP.

Authors:  Martijn de Jager; Claire Wyman; Dik C van Gent; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences.

Authors:  Vladimir Bidnenko; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  RuvAB and RecG are not essential for the recovery of DNA synthesis following UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Janet R Donaldson; Charmain T Courcelle; Justin Courcelle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Cells defective for replication restart undergo replication fork reversal.

Authors:  Gianfranco Grompone; Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 6.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Gianfranco Grompone; Maria-Jose Florès; Vladimir Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Asymmetric activation of Xer site-specific recombination by FtsK.

Authors:  Thomas H Massey; Laurent Aussel; François-Xavier Barre; David J Sherratt
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  RecN is a cohesin-like protein that stimulates intermolecular DNA interactions in vitro.

Authors:  Emigdio D Reyes; Praveen L Patidar; Lee A Uranga; Angelina S Bortoletto; Shelley L Lusetti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  In vivo evidence for a recA-independent recombination process in Escherichia coli that permits completion of replication of DNA containing UV damage in both strands.

Authors:  Ali I Ozgenc; Edward S Szekeres; Christopher W Lawrence
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Local mutagenic impact of insertions of LTR retrotransposons on the mouse genome.

Authors:  Erick Desmarais; Khalid Belkhir; John Carlos Garza; François Bonhomme
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-29       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.