Literature DB >> 12110601

Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences.

Vladimir Bidnenko1, S Dusko Ehrlich, Bénédicte Michel.   

Abstract

Replication fork arrest is a source of genome re arrangements, and the recombinogenic properties of blocked forks are likely to depend on the cause of blockage. Here we study the fate of replication forks blocked at natural replication arrest sites. For this purpose, Escherichia coli replication terminator sequences Ter were placed at ectopic positions on the bacterial chromosome. The resulting strain requires recombinational repair for viability, but replication forks blocked at Ter are not broken. Linear DNA molecules are formed upon arrival of a second round of replication forks that copy the DNA strands of the first blocked forks to the end. A model that accounts for the requirement for homologous recombination for viability in spite of the lack of chromosome breakage is proposed. This work shows that natural and accidental replication arrests sites are processed differently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12110601      PMCID: PMC126115          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  46 in total

Review 1.  Recombination at double-strand breaks and DNA ends: conserved mechanisms from phage to humans.

Authors:  G A Cromie; J C Connelly; D R Leach
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks.

Authors:  A Kuzminov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The relative contributions of recombination and point mutation to the diversification of bacterial clones.

Authors:  B G Spratt; W P Hanage; E J Feil
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  Mechanism of termination of DNA replication of Escherichia coli involves helicase-contrahelicase interaction.

Authors:  S Mulugu; A Potnis; J Taylor; K Alexander; D Bastia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  New versatile plasmid vectors for expression of hybrid proteins coded by a cloned gene fused to lacZ gene sequences encoding an enzymatically active carboxy-terminal portion of beta-galactosidase.

Authors:  S K Shapira; J Chou; F V Richaud; M J Casadaban
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 6.  Circles: the replication-recombination-chromosome segregation connection.

Authors:  F X Barre; B Søballe; B Michel; M Aroyo; M Robertson; D Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Site-specific recombination promoted by a short DNA segment of plasmid R1 and by a homologous segment in the terminus region of the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  M Clerget
Journal:  New Biol       Date:  1991-08

8.  XbaI and BlnI genomic cleavage maps of Escherichia coli K-12 strain MG1655 and comparative analysis of other strains.

Authors:  J D Perkins; J D Heath; B R Sharma; G M Weinstock
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The DNA replication fork blocked at the Ter site may be an entrance for the RecBCD enzyme into duplex DNA.

Authors:  T Horiuchi; Y Fujimura; H Nishitani; T Kobayashi; M Hidaka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Recombinational rescue of the stalled DNA replication fork: a model based on analysis of an Escherichia coli strain with a chromosome region difficult to replicate.

Authors:  T Horiuchi; Y Fujimura
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  52 in total

1.  Escherichia coli cells with increased levels of DnaA and deficient in recombinational repair have decreased viability.

Authors:  Aline V Grigorian; Rachel B Lustig; Elena C Guzmán; Joseph M Mahaffy; Judith W Zyskind
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Cells defective for replication restart undergo replication fork reversal.

Authors:  Gianfranco Grompone; Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Gianfranco Grompone; Maria-Jose Florès; Vladimir Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Measuring chromosome dynamics on different time scales using resolvases with varying half-lives.

Authors:  Richard A Stein; Shuang Deng; N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 5.  Replication termination in Escherichia coli: structure and antihelicase activity of the Tus-Ter complex.

Authors:  Cameron Neylon; Andrew V Kralicek; Thomas M Hill; Nicholas E Dixon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast.

Authors:  Jong Sook Ahn; Fekret Osman; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Tracking of controlled Escherichia coli replication fork stalling and restart at repressor-bound DNA in vivo.

Authors:  Christophe Possoz; Sergio R Filipe; Ian Grainge; David J Sherratt
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Defective ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase impairs replication fork progression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Estrella Guarino; Alfonso Jiménez-Sánchez; Elena C Guzmán
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?

Authors:  Karim Labib; Ben Hodgson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Replication fork inhibition in seqA mutants of Escherichia coli triggers replication fork breakage.

Authors:  Ella Rotman; Sharik R Khan; Elena Kouzminova; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.