Literature DB >> 15126385

RuvAB and RecG are not essential for the recovery of DNA synthesis following UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli.

Janet R Donaldson1, Charmain T Courcelle, Justin Courcelle.   

Abstract

Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126385      PMCID: PMC1470822          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  49 in total

1.  RecQ and RecJ process blocked replication forks prior to the resumption of replication in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Courcelle; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1999-10

2.  A model for replication repair in mammalian cells.

Authors:  N P Higgins; K Kato; B Strauss
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1976-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. IV. Isolation and characterization of recombination-deficiency mutants of Escherichia coli K12.

Authors:  P K Storm; W P Hoekstra; P G de Haan; C Verhoef
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Isolation of an E. coli strain with a mutation affecting DNA polymerase.

Authors:  P De Lucia; J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  DNA replication and recombination after UV irradiation.

Authors:  P Howard-Flanders; W D Rupp; B M Wilkins; R S Cole
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1968

6.  Selectivity for thymine over 5-bromouracil by a thymine-requiring bacterium.

Authors:  P Hackett; P Hanawalt
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1966-08-17

7.  The effect of 5-bromouracil on recombination of phage lambda.

Authors:  J W Little
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1976-07-15       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Mechanism of transient inhibition of DNA synthesis in ultraviolet-irradiated E. coli: inhibition is independent of recA whilst recovery requires RecA protein itself and an additional, inducible SOS function.

Authors:  M A Khidhir; S Casaregola; I B Holland
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1985

9.  Effect of ruv mutations on recombination and DNA repair in Escherichia coli K12.

Authors:  R G Lloyd; F E Benson; C E Shurvinton
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1984

10.  Isolation and characterization of an Escherichia coli ruv mutant which forms nonseptate filaments after low doses of ultraviolet light irradiation.

Authors:  N Otsuji; H Iyehara; Y Hideshima
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Gianfranco Grompone; Maria-Jose Florès; Vladimir Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria.

Authors:  Roshan Singh Thakur; Shivakumar Basavaraju; Jasbeer Singh Khanduja; K Muniyappa; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  RuvAB is essential for replication forks reversal in certain replication mutants.

Authors:  Zeynep Baharoglu; Mirjana Petranovic; Maria-Jose Flores; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Roles of PriA protein and double-strand DNA break repair functions in UV-induced restriction alleviation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ivana Ivancić-Bacće; Ignacija Vlasić; Gordana Cogelja-Cajo; Krunoslav Brcić-Kostić; Erika Salaj-Smic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Inactivation of the DnaB helicase leads to the collapse and degradation of the replication fork: a comparison to UV-induced arrest.

Authors:  Jerilyn J Belle; Andrew Casey; Charmain T Courcelle; Justin Courcelle
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Replication Restart in Bacteria.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Mfd is required for rapid recovery of transcription following UV-induced DNA damage but not oxidative DNA damage in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Brandy J Schalow; Charmain T Courcelle; Justin Courcelle
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Visualization of UV-induced replication intermediates in E. coli using two-dimensional agarose-gel analysis.

Authors:  H Arthur Jeiranian; Brandy J Schalow; Justin Courcelle
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  In vivo evidence for a recA-independent recombination process in Escherichia coli that permits completion of replication of DNA containing UV damage in both strands.

Authors:  Ali I Ozgenc; Edward S Szekeres; Christopher W Lawrence
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Pathological replication in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase.

Authors:  Christian J Rudolph; Amy L Upton; Lynda Harris; Robert G Lloyd
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.