Literature DB >> 17075698

Local mutagenic impact of insertions of LTR retrotransposons on the mouse genome.

Erick Desmarais1, Khalid Belkhir, John Carlos Garza, François Bonhomme.   

Abstract

Solitary LTR loci are the predominant form of LTR retrotransposons in most eukaryotic genomes. They originate from recombination between the two LTRs of an ancestral retrovirus and are therefore incapable of transposition. Despite this inactivity, they appear to have a substantial impact on the host genome. Here we use the murine RMER10 LTR family as an example to describe how such elements can reshape regions of the genome through multiple mutations on an evolutionary time scale. Specifically, we use phylogenetic analysis of multiple copies of RMER10 in rodent species, as well as comparisons of orthologous pairs in mouse and rat, to argue that insertions of members of this family have locally induced the emergence of tandem repeat loci as well as many indels. Analysis of structural aspects of these sequences (secondary structures and transcription factors signals) may explain why RMER10 can become endogenous "mutagenic" factors through induction of replication fork blockages and/or error-prone repair of aberrant DNA structures. This hypothesis is also consistent with features of other interspersed repeated elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075698     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-005-0301-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  74 in total

1.  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M M Cox; M F Goodman; K N Kreuzer; D J Sherratt; S J Sandler; K J Marians
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break".

Authors:  R Rothstein; B Michel; S Gangloff
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Human L1 retrotransposition: cis preference versus trans complementation.

Authors:  W Wei; N Gilbert; S L Ooi; J F Lawler; E M Ostertag; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke; J V Moran
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Mutations of the kissing-loop dimerization sequence influence the site specificity of murine leukemia virus recombination in vivo.

Authors:  J G Mikkelsen; A H Lund; M Duch; F S Pedersen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  The chemistry and biology of unusual DNA structures adopted by oligopurine.oligopyrimidine sequences.

Authors:  R D Wells; D A Collier; J C Hanvey; M Shimizu; F Wohlrab
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pausing of DNA synthesis in vitro at specific loci in CTG and CGG triplet repeats from human hereditary disease genes.

Authors:  S Kang; K Ohshima; M Shimizu; S Amirhaeri; R D Wells
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Occurrence of potential cruciform and H-DNA forming sequences in genomic DNA.

Authors:  G P Schroth; P S Ho
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation.

Authors:  D Tautz; M Trick; G A Dover
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Aug 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Survey of trinucleotide repeats in the human genome: assessment of their utility as genetic markers.

Authors:  J M Gastier; J C Pulido; S Sunden; T Brody; K H Buetow; J C Murray; J L Weber; T J Hudson; V C Sheffield; G M Duyk
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  Trinucleotide repeat DNA structures: dynamic mutations from dynamic DNA.

Authors:  C E Pearson; R R Sinden
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.