Literature DB >> 15328417

Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Bénédicte Michel1, Gianfranco Grompone, Maria-Jose Florès, Vladimir Bidnenko.   

Abstract

Impairment of replication fork progression is a serious threat to living organisms and a potential source of genome instability. Studies in prokaryotes have provided evidence that inactivated replication forks can restart by the reassembly of the replication machinery. Several strategies for the processing of inactivated replication forks before replisome reassembly have been described. Most of these require the action of recombination proteins, with different proteins being implicated, depending on the cause of fork arrest. The action of recombination proteins at blocked forks is not necessarily accompanied by a strand-exchange reaction and may prevent rather than repair fork breakage. These various restart pathways may reflect different structures at stalled forks. We review here the different strategies of fork processing elicited by different kinds of replication impairments in prokaryotes and the variety of roles played by recombination proteins in these processes. Copyright 2004 The National Academy of Sciencs of the USA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15328417      PMCID: PMC516472          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0401586101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  69 in total

Review 1.  Knot what we thought before: the twisted story of replication.

Authors:  L Postow; B J Peter; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Analysis of topoisomerase function in bacterial replication fork movement: use of DNA microarrays.

Authors:  A B Khodursky; B J Peter; M B Schmid; J DeRisi; D Botstein; P O Brown; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Replication fork reversal in DNA polymerase III mutants of Escherichia coli: a role for the beta clamp.

Authors:  Gianfranco Grompone; Marie Seigneur; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences.

Authors:  Vladimir Bidnenko; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  THYMINE DIMERS AND INHIBITION OF DNA SYNTHESIS BY ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION OF CELLS.

Authors:  R B SETLOW; P A SWENSON; W L CARRIER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks.

Authors:  M Seigneur; V Bidnenko; S D Ehrlich; B Michel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-10-30       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 8.  Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Richard D Kolodner; Christopher D Putnam; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

Authors:  José M Sogo; Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  168 in total

1.  Resolving Holliday junctions with Escherichia coli UvrD helicase.

Authors:  Annamarie S Carter; Kambiz Tahmaseb; Sarah A Compton; Steven W Matson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The rcbA gene product reduces spontaneous and induced chromosome breaks in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Magdalena M Felczak; Jon M Kaguni
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  BRCA1 is required for postreplication repair after UV-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Shailja Pathania; Jenna Nguyen; Sarah J Hill; Ralph Scully; Guillaume O Adelmant; Jarrod A Marto; Jean Feunteun; David M Livingston
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria.

Authors:  Roshan Singh Thakur; Shivakumar Basavaraju; Jasbeer Singh Khanduja; K Muniyappa; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Measuring chromosome dynamics on different time scales using resolvases with varying half-lives.

Authors:  Richard A Stein; Shuang Deng; N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast.

Authors:  Jong Sook Ahn; Fekret Osman; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Focus on recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites.

Authors:  Eliane El Achkar; Michelle Gerbault-Seureau; Martine Muleris; Bernard Dutrillaux; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  UvrD and UvrD252 counteract RecQ, RecJ, and RecFOR in a rep mutant of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Roxane Lestini; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Rad54, the motor of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Alexander V Mazin; Olga M Mazina; Dmitry V Bugreev; Matthew J Rossi
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.