Literature DB >> 11440759

Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.

M E McCourt1.   

Abstract

Pseudoneglect (PN) refers to the leftward error exhibited by normal observers on line bisection tasks (Bowers and Heilman, Neuropsychologia, 18, (1980) 491-8). Although a thorough review of the literature has shown PN to be relatively robust (Jewell and McCourt, Neuropsychologia, 38, (2000) 93-110), controversy remains concerning the reliability of the phenomenon, with some studies reporting a relatively high incidence of normal subjects with rightward bisection errors. The present experiment assesses the consistency of bisection performance in normal young observers. Right-handed subjects (N=22) participated in a tachistoscopic forced-choice line bisection task. Each subject participated in 7-16 experimental sessions separated by at least 24 h (total bisection measurements=317). Individual bisection performance could thus be evaluated with respect to within-subject variability measures. An eyetracker recorded gaze position during the task in one session. A highly significant mean group bisection error of -0.26 degrees (P<0.001) was obtained (left negative), and individual subject means ranged from -0.55 degrees to +0.03 degrees. Of the 317 total bisection measurements, 9% (28) deviated rightward. Significant (P<0.05) mean leftward errors occurred in 91% (20/22) of subjects. Mean bisection error in two subjects was not significantly different from zero. No subject possessed a significant rightward error. Mean gaze deviation from screen (and line) center ranged from +/-0.9 degrees, and was positively correlated (P<0.05) with bisection error. It is concluded that forced-choice tachistoscopic line bisection measures are highly reliable; a mean correlation of +0.87 exists between mean error based on 15 trials and means estimated from a random sample of only two trials. The incidence of true rightward bisection error in the population of normal right-handed subjects is thus estimated to be less than 5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11440759     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00044-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  37 in total

1.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

2.  Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task.

Authors:  Ancrêt Szpak; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Thomas M VanVleet; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.

Authors:  Matia Okubo; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.

Authors:  Anika Maraj; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Andrea M Loftus; Wim Gevers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

Review 8.  A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?

Authors:  M Ribolsi; G Di Lorenzo; G Lisi; C Niolu; A Siracusano
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-11-07

9.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.