Literature DB >> 26645309

Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task.

Ancrêt Szpak1, Nicole A Thomas2, Michael E R Nicholls2.   

Abstract

Research suggests that the left cerebral hemisphere is predisposed for processing stimuli in 'near' space, whereas the right hemisphere is specialised for processing stimuli in 'far' space. This hypothesis was tested directly by asking 25 undergraduates to carry out a landmark radial line bisection task. To test the effect of hemispheric differences in processing, the lines were placed to the left, right or centre within the transverse plane. Consistent with predictions, lines in all three conditions were bisected distal to the true centre. More importantly, there was an asymmetry whereby the distal bias was stronger for lines presented in the left hemispace compared to the right hemispace. The results demonstrate that the perception of depth is affected by left/right placement along the lateral axis and highlight the cognitive/neural interplay between the radial and lateral axes.

Keywords:  Hemispheric asymmetries; Near/far space; Radial landmark line task; Visual asymmetries

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645309     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4504-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.

Authors:  M E McCourt; G Jewell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Depth cues and constancy scaling in the horizontal-vertical illusion: the bisection error.

Authors:  J S Girgus; S Coren
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1975-03

3.  Far bias on the radial line bisection task: measuring perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in normal subjects.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett; J Brent Crosson; Gregory P Crucian; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Central fixations with rightward deviations: saccadic eye movements on the landmark task.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Altitudinal neglect following traumatic brain injury: a case report.

Authors:  C M Butter; J Evans; N Kirsch; D Kewman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Eye and head turning indicates cerebral lateralization.

Authors:  M Kinsbourne
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The visuomotor system resists the horizontal-vertical illusion.

Authors:  P Servos; H Carnahan; J Fedwick
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Jason B Mattingley; Nadja Berberovic; Amanda Smith; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-05

9.  On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Monika Harvey; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks.

Authors:  Metehan Ciçek; Leon Y Deouell; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Giovanni Messina; Ines Villano; Antonietta Messina; Ciro Rosario Ilardi; Marcellino Monda; Monica Salerno; Francesco Sessa; Maria Pina Mollica; Gina Cavaliere; Giovanna Trinchese; Fabiano Cimmino; Paolo Murabito; Angela Catapano; Vincenzo Monda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.