Literature DB >> 19633341

Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Christopher A Dickinson1, Helene Intraub.   

Abstract

Given a single fixation, memory for scenes containing salient objects near both the left and right view boundaries exhibited a rightward bias in boundary extension (Experiment 1). On each trial, a 500-msec picture and 2.5-sec mask were followed by a boundary adjustment task. Observers extended boundaries 5% more on the right than on the left. Might this reflect an asymmetric distribution of attention? In Experiments 2A and 2B, free viewing of pictures revealed that first saccades were more often leftward (62%) than rightward (38%). In Experiment 3, 500-msec pictures were interspersed with 2.5-sec masks. A subsequent object recognition memory test revealed better memory for left-side objects. Scenes were always mirror reversed for half the observers, thus ruling out idiosyncratic scene compositions as the cause of these asymmetries. Results suggest an unexpected leftward bias of attention that selectively enhanced the representations, causing a smaller boundary extension error and better object memory on the views' left sides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633341      PMCID: PMC2792631          DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  67 in total

1.  Lexical decisions in the right and left cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  L Leiber
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing.

Authors:  M Martin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.

Authors:  A Friedman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-09

4.  Disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after lesions of the right hemisphere.

Authors:  E Bisiach; L Cornacchia; R Sterzi; G Vallar
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task.

Authors:  D Bowers; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Visual information processing in the left and right hemispheres.

Authors:  D Hines
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; S Bolozky; A D Well; K Rayner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Auditory neglect in man.

Authors:  K M Heilman; E Valenstein
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1972-01

Review 10.  A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  19 in total

1.  The role of arousal in boundary judgement errors.

Authors:  Deanne M Green; Jessica A Wilcock; Melanie K T Takarangi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

2.  Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Authors:  Ellie Aniulis; Owen Churches; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The Ebbinghaus illusion with small inducers appears larger on the right side.

Authors:  Ayako Saneyoshi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Fixating picture boundaries does not eliminate boundary extension: implications for scene representation.

Authors:  Kristin Michod Gagnier; Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Visual routines for extracting magnitude relations.

Authors:  Audrey L Michal; David Uttal; Priti Shah; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

7.  Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Representational pseudoneglect in line bisection.

Authors:  Stephen Darling; Robert H Logie; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

Review 9.  Representational pseudoneglect: a review.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Sergio Della Sala; Stephen Darling
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Irrelevant tactile stimulation biases visual exploration in external coordinates.

Authors:  José P Ossandón; Peter König; Tobias Heed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.