Literature DB >> 18488661

Look, no hands: a perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention.

Michael E R Nicholls1, Andrea M Loftus, Wim Gevers.   

Abstract

The mental representation of numbers along a line oriented left to right affects spatial cognition, facilitating responses in the ipsilateral hemispace (the spatial-numerical association of response codes [SNARC] effect). We investigated whether the number/space association is the result of an attentional shift or response selection. Previous research has often introduced covert left/right response cues by presenting targets to the left or the right. The present study avoided left/right cues by requiring forced choice upper/lower luminance discriminations to two mirror-reversed luminance gradients (the grayscale task). The grayscale stimuli were overlaid with strings of (1) low numbers, (2) high numbers, and (3) nonnumerical characters. In Experiment 1, 20 dextrals judged the number's magnitude and then indicated whether the upper/lower grayscale was darker. Results showed leftward and rightward attentional biases for low and high numbers, respectively. Demands to process numbers along a left/right line were made less explicit in Experiment 2 (N = 18 dextrals), using (1) a parity judgment and (2) arbitrary linguistic labels for top/bottom. Once again, a spatial congruency effect was observed. Because the response (up/down) was orthogonal to the dimension of interest (left/right), the effect of number cannot be attributed to late-stage response congruencies. This study required unspeeded responses to stimuli presented in free vision, whereas other experiments have used speeded responses. Understanding the time course of number-space effects may, therefore, be important to the debate associated with response selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18488661     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.

Authors:  M E McCourt; G Jewell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases.

Authors:  M H Fischer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs.

Authors:  S Kennett; M Eimer; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized.

Authors:  Wim Gevers; Bert Reynvoet; Wim Fias
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-04

5.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?

Authors:  Daniela Mapelli; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07

Review 6.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Inge M Keus
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

Review 8.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line.

Authors:  Ivilin Stoianov; Peter Kramer; Carlo Umiltà; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-06-06

10.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size.

Authors:  M E Nicholls; J L Bradshaw; J B Mattingley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  22 in total

1.  Numbers can move our hands: a spatial representation effect in digits handwriting.

Authors:  Gelsomina Perrone; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Emanuela Bricolo; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-04-10

3.  Tapping effects on numerical bisection.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Micaela Fantino; Juha Silvanto; Giuseppe Vallar; Tomaso Vecchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space.

Authors:  Mariagrazia Ranzini; Matteo Lisi; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-02

5.  Interactions between perceptual and numerical space.

Authors:  Peter Kramer; Ivilin Stoianov; Carlo Umiltà; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

6.  Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks.

Authors:  Samuel Di Luca; Mauro Pesenti; Giuseppe Vallar; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Authors:  Ellie Aniulis; Owen Churches; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  On the genesis of spatial-numerical associations: Evolutionary and cultural factors co-construct the mental number line.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Toomarian; Edward M Hubbard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  The effect of hand movements on numerical bisection judgments in early blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Luca Rinaldi; Tomaso Vecchi; Micaela Fantino; Lotfi B Merabet; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  The middle range of the number line orients attention to the left side of visual space.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Juha Silvanto; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.