Literature DB >> 11404332

The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

D Chavarrías1, C López-Fanjul, A García-Dorado.   

Abstract

The effect of 250 generations of mutation accumulation (MA) on the second chromosome competitive viability of Drosophila melanogaster was analyzed both in homozygous and heterozygous conditions. We used full-sib MA lines, where selection hampers the accumulation of severely deleterious mutations but is ineffective against mildly deleterious ones. A large control population was simultaneously evaluated. Competitive viability scores, unaffected by the expression of mutations in heterozygosis, were obtained relative to a Cy/L(2) genotype. The rate of decline in mean DeltaM approximately 0.1% was small. However, that of increase in variance DeltaV approximately 0.08 x 10(-3) was similar to the values obtained in previous experiments when severely deleterious mutations were excluded. The corresponding estimates of the mutation rate lambda > or = 0.01 and the average effect of mutations E(s) < or = 0.08 are in good agreement with Bateman-Mukai and minimum distance estimates for noncompetitive viability obtained from the same MA lines after 105 generations. Thus, competitive and noncompetitive viability show similar mutational properties. The regression estimate of the degree of dominance for mild-to-moderate deleterious mutations was approximately 0.3, suggesting that the pertinent value for new unselected mutations should be somewhat smaller.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11404332      PMCID: PMC1461667     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  21 in total

1.  On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Caballero; M A Toro; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations.

Authors:  O Ohnishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Fernández; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection.

Authors:  S A Shabalina; A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nature of deleterious mutation load in Drosophila.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A pleiotropic nonadditive model of variation in quantitative traits.

Authors:  A Caballero; P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; D Houle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Spontaneous mutational effects on reproductive traits of arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  R G Shaw; D L Byers; E Darmo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The distribution of spontaneous mutations on quantitative traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Santiago; J Albornoz; A Domínguez; M A Toro; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  21 in total

1.  Pleiotropic model of maintenance of quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  James D Fry; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Environment dependence of mutational parameters for viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  James D Fry; Stefanie L Heinsohn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Comparing analysis methods for mutation-accumulation data: a simulation study.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado; Araceli Gallego
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.

Authors:  Carlos López-Fanjul; Almudena Fernández; Miguel A Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Patrick C Phillips; Dee R Denver; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Relaxation of selection with equalization of parental contributions in conservation programs: an experimental test with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S T Rodríguez-Ramilo; P Morán; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.