Literature DB >> 12807799

Comparing analysis methods for mutation-accumulation data: a simulation study.

Aurora García-Dorado1, Araceli Gallego.   

Abstract

We simulated single-generation data for a fitness trait in mutation-accumulation (MA) experiments, and we compared three methods of analysis. Bateman-Mukai (BM) and maximum likelihood (ML) need information on both the MA lines and control lines, while minimum distance (MD) can be applied with or without the control. Both MD and ML assume gamma-distributed mutational effects. ML estimates of the rate of deleterious mutation had larger mean square error (MSE) than MD or BM had due to large outliers. MD estimates obtained by ignoring the mean decline observed from comparison to a control are often better than those obtained using that information. When effects are simulated using the gamma distribution, reducing the precision with which the trait is assayed increases the probability of obtaining no ML or MD estimates but causes no appreciable increase of the MSE. When the residual errors for the means of the simulated lines are sampled from the empirical distribution in a MA experiment, instead of from a normal one, the MSEs of BM, ML, and MD are practically unaffected. When the simulated gamma distribution accounts for a high rate of mild deleterious mutation, BM detects only approximately 30% of the true deleterious mutation rate, while MD or ML detects substantially larger fractions. To test the robustness of the methods, we also added a high rate of common contaminant mutations with constant mild deleterious effect to a low rate of mutations with gamma-distributed deleterious effects and moderate average. In that case, BM detects roughly the same fraction as before, regardless of the precision of the assay, while ML fails to provide estimates. However, MD estimates are obtained by ignoring the control information, detecting approximately 70% of the total mutation rate when the mean of the lines is assayed with good precision, but only 15% for low-precision assays. Contaminant mutations with only tiny deleterious effects could not be detected with acceptable accuracy by any of the above methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12807799      PMCID: PMC1462587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Chavarrías; C López-Fanjul; A García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inference of genome-wide mutation rates and distributions of mutation effects for fitness traits: a simulation study.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Minimum distance estimation of mutational parameters for quantitative traits.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; J M Marín
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The mutation rate and the distribution of mutational effects of viability and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; J L Monedero; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley; O Ohnishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Fernández; C López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; C López-Fanjul; A Caballero
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; S I Chigusa; L E Mettler; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Multigeneration maximum-likelihood analysis applied to mutation-accumulation experiments in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  P D Keightley; T M Bataillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  8 in total

1.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Maximum likelihood vs. minimum distance: searching for hills in the plain.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado; Araceli Gallego
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Behavioral degradation under mutation accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Beverly C Ajie; Suzanne Estes; Michael Lynch; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Victoria Avila; David Chavarrías; Enrique Sánchez; Antonio Manrique; Carlos López-Fanjul; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Analysis and implications of mutational variation.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Daniel L Halligan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gregory I Lang; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Genomic mutation rates: what high-throughput methods can tell us.

Authors:  Koodali T Nishant; Nadia D Singh; Eric Alani
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Partial mixture model for tight clustering of gene expression time-course.

Authors:  Yinyin Yuan; Chang-Tsun Li; Roland Wilson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.