Literature DB >> 1905662

The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

A Caballero1, M A Toro, C López-Fanjul.   

Abstract

Twenty generations of divergent selection for abdominal bristle number were carried out starting from a completely homozygous population of Drosophila melanogaster. All lines were selected with the same proportion (20%) but at two different numbers of selected parents of each sex (5 or 25). A significant response to selection was detected in eight lines (out of 40) and, in most cases, it could be wholly attributed to a single mutation of relatively large effect (0.5-2 phenotypic standard deviations). The ratio of new mutational variance to environmental variance was estimated to be (0.33 +/- 0.11) X 10(-3). The distribution of mutant effects was asymmetrical, both with respect to bristle number (85% of it was negative) and to fitness (most detected bristle mutations were lethal or semilethal). Moreover, this distribution was leptokurtic, due to the presence of major genes. Gene action on bristles ranged from additive to completely recessive, no epistatic interactions being found. In agreement with theory, larger responses in each direction were achieved by those lines selected at greater effective population sizes. Furthermore, the observed divergence between lines selected in opposite directions was proportional to their effective size, as predicted for mutations of large effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1905662      PMCID: PMC1204457     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations.

Authors:  P D Keightley; W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  The rate of polygenic mutation.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Roff; T A Mousseau
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Models of long-term artificial selection in finite population with recurrent mutation.

Authors:  W G Hill; J Rasbash
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Directional selection and variation in finite populations.

Authors:  P D Keightley; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effects of population size and selection intesnity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection.

Authors:  L P Jones; R Frankham; J S Barker
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  The introduction of genetic material from inferior into superior strains.

Authors:  H E Osman; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 3. Analyses of the lines.

Authors:  R Frankham; L P Jones; J S Barker
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 9.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Effects of linkage on response to directional selection from new mutations.

Authors:  P D Keightley; W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  33 in total

1.  The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Chavarrías; C López-Fanjul; A García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Relaxation of selection with equalization of parental contributions in conservation programs: an experimental test with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S T Rodríguez-Ramilo; P Morán; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Effects of partial inbreeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes.

Authors:  A Caballero; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The dynamics of the roo transposable element in mutation-accumulation lines and segregating populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Montserrat Papaceit; Victoria Avila; Montserrat Aguadé; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Victoria Avila; David Chavarrías; Enrique Sánchez; Antonio Manrique; Carlos López-Fanjul; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Mutation-selection balance and metabolic control theory.

Authors:  A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Polymorphic genes of major effect: consequences for variation, selection and evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  John R Stinchcombe; Cynthia Weinig; Katy D Heath; Marcus T Brock; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Within-generation mutation variance for litter size in inbred mice.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Juan F Medrano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Drosophila bristles and the nature of quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  Trudy F Mackay; Richard F Lyman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.